85% of it is the camera
Seeing his camera setup is quite impressive:85% of it is the camera
That isn't necessarily true. The quality of the camera is, but the knowledge and skill the photographer has is was makes the difference between a picture took by a novice photog w/a great camera and a pro photog w/a great camera.85% of it is the camera
How many shots do you think was taken in order to get that shot?That isn't necessarily true. The quality of the camera is, but the knowledge and skill the photographer has is was makes the difference between a picture took by a novice photog w/a great camera and a pro photog w/a great camera.
I thought the same thing a few years back before I seriously got into photography and I now know that an awesome photographer can take the most dramatic pictures with even a crappy camera. It is immensely more difficult that you think.
I've been to shows (I mainly shoot live bands) and seen photogs with expensive cameras and flashes and looked at the pics they took that night and they are shitty.
But yea.....that setup is RETARDED!!! haha I wish I had that many flashes at my disposal lol
Not too sure. Kinda hard to say. The D300 has a 12.3 megapixel resolution, and using a 200 ISO setting w/ F11, and a focal length of 340mm.... That's a long zoom. By looking at his other thread it seems as though he just had to keep shooting bc apparently the bird stayed around the feeder. For that one perfect angle, I'd say depending how fast his trigger finger was, b/w 50-100 shots. Photogs try to have a high keeper rate, and usually the better photogs will be much higher. I usually have to discard 70% of the pics I take :/How many shots do you think was taken in order to get that shot?
If you sorta know what you're doing then 10 or less, if you really know what you're doing then just 1.How many shots do you think was taken in order to get that shot?