#2
·
Jan 27, 2004
Why is it that this guy can make over 501 and some guys can get their car started?
#5
·
Jan 27, 2004
dragradialstang said:
You should be right there with him!
I haven't try to start mine in three months.
#6
·
Jan 27, 2004
TexasDevilDog said:
Why is it that this guy can make over 501 and some guys can get their car started?
I don't see how anyone can spin a bearing in a 13sec car?
#8
·
Jan 27, 2004
302_plus_a_few said:
I bet that thing doesn't last a season.
even you should be impressed with those numbers from a na motor
#9
·
Jan 27, 2004
HobieF3 said:
even you should be impressed with those numbers from a na motor
Oh yea, its impressive. No doubt. Its just that these things are all just ticking time bombs. Nothing like building a new 500rwhp long block every couple of months to put a damper on your racing style.
#10
·
Jan 27, 2004
I made more than that with a wimpy stock 5.0 shortblock at the old Fastech. Sean Freese did the dyno!! I never even had the pan off of that motor
#12
·
Jan 27, 2004
spankustang said:
I made more than that with a wimpy stock 5.0 shortblock at the old Fastech. Sean Freese did the dyno!! I never even had the pan off of that motor
Something tells me that wasn't NA
#13
·
Jan 27, 2004
Stock shortblock, crane 2031, canfield heads, holley intake, s-trim, and c-4
#14
·
Jan 27, 2004
spankustang said:
Stock shortblock, crane 2031, canfield heads, holley intake, s-trim, and c-4
I've seen civics make 500fwhp with boost. The Ls1 in question did it N/A stock bottom end.
You just need a huge cam and good set of heads and the rest of the supporting bolt-on cast.
hmmm good heads, and a huge cam. Who else has those?
#15
·
Jan 27, 2004
obviously with wimpy trq # it's a 6sp car, so that means it'll run some 11.50's and then it'll come apart!!!
#16
·
Jan 27, 2004
spankustang said:
obviously with wimpy trq # it's a 6sp car, so that means it'll run some 11.50's and then it'll come apart!!!
I guess you over looked this part.
"last time i went to the track i ran 10.58 @ 130 mph!! at that time we had
480 rwhp and 415-420 rwtq"
#17
·
Jan 27, 2004
Too bad Cartek isn't local or the LS1.com guys would have another tuner to worship. They even work on Pat Musi's car!
#18
·
Jan 27, 2004
TexasDevilDog said:
I haven't try to start mine in three months.
I meant JC!
#19
·
Jan 27, 2004
dragradialstang said:
He's been trying to start his for three months.
#20
·
Jan 27, 2004
DMcRacer said:
I guess you over looked this part.
"last time i went to the track i ran 10.58 @ 130 mph!! at that time we had
480 rwhp and 415-420 rwtq"
The only LS1 that i've seen in the 10's is Sean's. I know there are a few more, but i also know that after about the 3 or 4th pass it'll break!!!!
#21
·
Jan 27, 2004
what did it weigh??? It didn't weigh 3400#+ like the avg. LS1 did it??
#22
·
Jan 27, 2004
spankustang said:
what did it weigh??? It didn't weigh 3400#+ like the avg. LS1 did it??
It's a Vette!
#24
·
Jan 27, 2004
spankustang said:
The only LS1 that i've seen in the 10's is Sean's. I know there are a few more, but i also know that after about the 3 or 4th pass it'll break!!!!
There aren't that many vehicles on this website that run 10s without breaking something. Especially with a stock motor.
Things have changed since you had that white Z, Brian. It's not uncommon to see a 10 second LS1 anymore.
#25
·
Jan 27, 2004
David Z28 said:
There aren't that many vehicles on this website that run 10s without breaking something. Especially with a stock motor.
Things have changed since you had that white Z, Brian. It's not uncommon to see a 10 second LS1 anymore.
Yea,
Just about anything that's fairly stock is gonna break if it's making power(mine did).
And I know there's some LS1's in the 10's and 9's. But I also think if you go to the track, you'll see more ten second mustangs than LS1's. By the way, I still like the LS1. Probly the best bang for the buck since 87-93 mustangs!!
#26
·
Jan 27, 2004
I'd be interested to see the dyno graph on the car versus the old combination...
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.