NFL Power Rankings After Week 1 - DFWstangs Forums
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 12:53 PM Thread Starter
Lifer
 
philsanity07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Grand Prairie
Posts: 1,052
NFL Power Rankings After Week 1

1. Saints
2. Packers
3. Patriots
4. Steelers
5. Texans
6. Colts
7. Ravens
8. Giants
9. Jets
10. Cowboys
11. Vikings
12. Titans
13. Falcons
14. Cardinals
15. Chargers
16. Bengals
17. Redskins
18. Seahawkd
19. Chiefs
20. Dolphins
21. Eagles
22. Bears
23. Buccaneers
24. Jaguars
25. Lions
26. 49ers
27. Broncos
28. Browns
29. Rams
30. Panthers
31. Raiders
32. Bills

This is just my opinion

St. Louis Rams 4-4
rams Pictures, Images and Photos


marshall faulk Pictures, Images and Photos
philsanity07 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 01:52 PM
DFWMUSTANGS.NET
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Mesquite
Posts: 2,079
Cowboys are #10 on your list? Did you not see the game? Steelers are #4?
Lone Sailor is offline  
post #3 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 01:55 PM
HERE WE GO STEELERS
 
Geor!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: HERE WE GO!!!
Posts: 18,685
Steelers need to be a bit lower until Dixon proves his worth or Ben is back on the field. I love how the offense got back to playing Steeler football by running the ball, but I fear it was only because they have close to zero trust in Dixon.

Geor! is offline  
 
post #4 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 01:56 PM Thread Starter
Lifer
 
philsanity07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Grand Prairie
Posts: 1,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geor! View Post
Steelers need to be a bit lower until Dixon proves his worth or Ben is back on the field. I love how the offense got back to playing Steeler football by running the ball, but I fear it was only because they have close to zero trust in Dixon.
i like Dixon, I think if he can get some confidence that he can do a good job

St. Louis Rams 4-4
rams Pictures, Images and Photos


marshall faulk Pictures, Images and Photos
philsanity07 is offline  
post #5 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 01:58 PM
DFWMUSTANGS.NET
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Mesquite
Posts: 2,079
Thumbs up

1. Saints
2. Packers
3. Texans
4. Patriots
5. Colts
5. Ravens
7. Giants
8. Titans
9. Vikings
10. Jets
11. Steelers
12. Chiefs
13. Falcons
14. Cardinals
15. Bengals
16. Redskins
17. Cowboys
18. Seahawks
19. Chargers
20. Dolphins
21. Eagles
22. Bears
23. Buccaneers
24. Jaguars
25. Lions
26. 49ers
27. Broncos
28. Browns
29. Rams
30. Panthers
31. Raiders
32. Bills
Lone Sailor is offline  
post #6 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 01:59 PM Thread Starter
Lifer
 
philsanity07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Grand Prairie
Posts: 1,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lone Sailor View Post
1. Saints
2. Packers
3. Texans
4. Patriots
5. Colts
5. Ravens
7. Giants
8. Titans
9. Vikings
10. Jets
11. Steelers
12. Chiefs
13. Falcons
14. Cardinals
15. Bengals
16. Redskins
17. Cowboys
18. Seahawks
19. Chargers
20. Dolphins
21. Eagles
22. Bears
23. Buccaneers
24. Jaguars
25. Lions
26. 49ers
27. Broncos
28. Browns
29. Rams
30. Panthers
31. Raiders
32. Bills
lol i actually like yours better

St. Louis Rams 4-4
rams Pictures, Images and Photos


marshall faulk Pictures, Images and Photos
philsanity07 is offline  
post #7 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 02:01 PM
Resident Epicurean
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Irving
Posts: 23,270
How do you have the Bengals above the Cowboys after the raping they got from NE? Atlanta as well.

I think the Cowboys still belong around 10 or so. They lose next week, then we can move them down.


EDIT: Woah there, I see a lot of teams that don't belong where Lone Sailor put them...
bcoop is offline  
post #8 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 02:15 PM
DFWMUSTANGS.NET
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Mesquite
Posts: 2,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcoop View Post
How do you have the Bengals above the Cowboys after the raping they got from NE? Atlanta as well.

I think the Cowboys still belong around 10 or so. They lose next week, then we can move them down.


EDIT: Woah there, I see a lot of teams that don't belong where Lone Sailor put them...
What have the Cowboys proven? Last 2 games they have played like shit and lost. What justifies that this is great team that you apparently saw playing on Sunday?
Lone Sailor is offline  
post #9 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 02:21 PM
HERE WE GO STEELERS
 
Geor!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: HERE WE GO!!!
Posts: 18,685
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lone Sailor View Post
What have the Cowboys proven? Last 2 games they have played like shit and lost. What justifies that this is great team that you apparently saw playing on Sunday?
Keep in mind, power rankins are a week-week deal. Brent might be basing his off of the performance and what the performance should be if they are healthy.

That being said, Steelers still don't belong at 4. Not sure that they belong at 11 either, so i'lll go with 8 as a happy medium.

Geor! is offline  
post #10 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 02:22 PM
Resident Epicurean
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Irving
Posts: 23,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lone Sailor View Post
What have the Cowboys proven? Last 2 games they have played like shit and lost. What justifies that this is great team that you apparently saw playing on Sunday?
First off, you can't judge anything by pre-season, unless you judge the rest of the teams accordingly.

2, They won their division last year. Saints, and several others high on your list are riding on last season's coattails, since we are only 1 week in on this season. For instance, I certainly wouldn't place the Saints @ #1, because quite honestly they struggled with a Minnesota team that played like absolute shit.

Cincy got bent over and gang raped, but deserve to be ranked 15? The Packers beat a horrible Philly team, and deserve to be top 3? I don't think so... The Colts, THAT GOT BEAT, are top 5? No sir. Titans top 10? They beat fucking Oakland. Let's be serious here. Vikings certainly don't deserve to be top 10. By the way they played the Saints, they don't deserve top 20. Falcons got beat, but you have them 2 spots behind the team that beat them, yet in front of teams that still don't have a loss.


I'm just saying it's illogical, that's all.
bcoop is offline  
post #11 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 02:25 PM
DFWMUSTANGS.NET
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Mesquite
Posts: 2,079
There's always going to be the woulda/coulda/shoulda crowd, and they're hopers and dreamers. You know, clouded judgment, etc. I'm the SOS will get thrown out pretty soon even though the Redskins aren't a real juggernaut or anything.
Lone Sailor is offline  
post #12 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 02:27 PM
Lifer
 
mstng86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Forney, TX
Posts: 7,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcoop View Post
First off, you can't judge anything by pre-season, unless you judge the rest of the teams accordingly.

2, They won their division last year. Saints, and several others high on your list are riding on last season's coattails, since we are only 1 week in on this season. For instance, I certainly wouldn't place the Saints @ #1, because quite honestly they struggled with a Minnesota team that played like absolute shit.

Cincy got bent over and gang raped, but deserve to be ranked 15? The Packers beat a horrible Philly team, and deserve to be top 3? I don't think so... The Colts, THAT GOT BEAT, are top 5? No sir. Titans top 10? They beat fucking Oakland. Let's be serious here. Vikings certainly don't deserve to be top 10. By the way they played the Saints, they don't deserve top 20. Falcons got beat, but you have them 2 spots behind the team that beat them, yet in front of teams that still don't have a loss.


I'm just saying it's illogical, that's all.

Don't bring your fancy logic into an illogical thread.
mstng86 is offline  
post #13 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 02:28 PM
DFWMUSTANGS.NET
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Mesquite
Posts: 2,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcoop View Post
First off, you can't judge anything by pre-season, unless you judge the rest of the teams accordingly.

2, They won their division last year. Saints, and several others high on your list are riding on last season's coattails, since we are only 1 week in on this season. For instance, I certainly wouldn't place the Saints @ #1, because quite honestly they struggled with a Minnesota team that played like absolute shit.

Cincy got bent over and gang raped, but deserve to be ranked 15? The Packers beat a horrible Philly team, and deserve to be top 3? I don't think so... The Colts, THAT GOT BEAT, are top 5? No sir. Titans top 10? They beat fucking Oakland. Let's be serious here. Vikings certainly don't deserve to be top 10. By the way they played the Saints, they don't deserve top 20. Falcons got beat, but you have them 2 spots behind the team that beat them, yet in front of teams that still don't have a loss.


I'm just saying it's illogical, that's all.
First off, who said anything about the fucking preseason? Get off the preseason high horse already. I'm talking about the Minnesota Vikings whippin' that ass in the playoffs.

Secondly, that's great that you have an opinion of why the order I have the rankings in is wrong, but until you post a list for the rest of us to pick apart then you're just armchair quarterbacking, bud.
Lone Sailor is offline  
post #14 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 02:28 PM
Resident Epicurean
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Irving
Posts: 23,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lone Sailor View Post
There's always going to be the woulda/coulda/shoulda crowd, and they're hopers and dreamers. You know, clouded judgment, etc. I'm the SOS will get thrown out pretty soon even though the Redskins aren't a real juggernaut or anything.
I could see your point about clouded judgement if I had only commented on where you have the Cowboys, but there are several teams I disagree about.
bcoop is offline  
post #15 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 02:30 PM
Resident Epicurean
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Irving
Posts: 23,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lone Sailor View Post
First off, who said anything about the fucking preseason? Get off the preseason high horse already. I'm talking about the Minnesota Vikings whippin' that ass in the playoffs.

Secondly, that's great that you have an opinion of why the order I have the rankings in is wrong, but until you post a list for the rest of us to pick apart then you're just armchair quarterbacking, bud.
I'm posting from my phone, so get your panties out of a bunch, Nancy. But since you want to talk about the playoff game, I sure as he'll didn't see the Packers in that game. So what have you seen from them that makes them deserving of the rank you gave them?
bcoop is offline  
post #16 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 02:30 PM
Lifer
 
mstng86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Forney, TX
Posts: 7,612
Why are we making power rankings after 1 week. That is idiotic.

Just sayin.
mstng86 is offline  
post #17 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 02:32 PM
DFWMUSTANGS.NET
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Mesquite
Posts: 2,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcoop View Post
I'm posting from my phone, so get your panties out of a bunch, Nancy.
Don't assume that because I used profanity that it means that I am bothered in the least. If I were, I would have posted a novel.
Lone Sailor is offline  
post #18 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:01 PM
Lifer
 
46Tbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 33,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lone Sailor View Post
1. Saints
2. Packers
3. Texans
4. Patriots
5. Colts
5. Ravens
7. Giants
8. Titans
9. Vikings
10. Jets
11. Steelers
12. Chiefs
13. Falcons
14. Cardinals
15. Bengals
16. Redskins
17. Cowboys
18. Seahawks
19. Chargers
20. Dolphins
21. Eagles
22. Bears
23. Buccaneers
24. Jaguars
25. Lions
26. 49ers
27. Broncos
28. Browns
29. Rams
30. Panthers
31. Raiders
32. Bills
Packers #2 after they squeak past a bunch of rookies in Philly? Then Cowboys are #17? I'd say your homerism is in full effect.

I'm not going to bother with a list because it's asinine after week 1 when every team has the jitters. I don't like what I've seen out of the Cowboys for sure so far, but the mistakes are due to coaching issues and not talent. I think they'll turn it around very soon. I can't wait to see how the season wraps up, I'll go hunting for your power rankings and I bet it will be pretty funny then...
46Tbird is offline  
post #19 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:07 PM
HERE WE GO STEELERS
 
Geor!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: HERE WE GO!!!
Posts: 18,685
Quote:
Originally Posted by 46Tbird View Post
Packers #2 after they squeak past a bunch of rookies in Philly? Then Cowboys are #17? I'd say your homerism is in full effect.

I'm not going to bother with a list because it's asinine after week 1 when every team has the jitters. I don't like what I've seen out of the Cowboys for sure so far, but the mistakes are due to coaching issues and not talent. I think they'll turn it around very soon. I can't wait to see how the season wraps up, I'll go hunting for your power rankings and I bet it will be pretty funny then...
I'm surprised you're not a bald Eagles fan!!

Geor! is offline  
post #20 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:11 PM
Resident Epicurean
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Irving
Posts: 23,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geor! View Post
I'm surprised you're not a bald Eagles fan!!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


Been a while since we've had a good Danny going bald joke on here.
bcoop is offline  
post #21 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:15 PM
Lifer
 
IDAjeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,334
Whoooooohoooooo New Orleans Saints #1 thought so....


Now the Denver Broncos.... eh not so much. LOL!

Why aren't the Redskins inhead of the Cowgirls

New Orleans Saints 16-3 Super Bowl Champions 2010!!!!

Super Bowl 2011 preview

(6-3-0) New Orleans Saints......................(3-6-0) Denver Broncos
Dallas Cowboys fucking suck
IDAjeff is offline  
post #22 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:16 PM
DFWMUSTANGS.NET
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Mesquite
Posts: 2,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by 46Tbird View Post
Packers #2 after they squeak past a bunch of rookies in Philly? Then Cowboys are #17? I'd say your homerism is in full effect.

I'm not going to bother with a list because it's asinine after week 1 when every team has the jitters. I don't like what I've seen out of the Cowboys for sure so far, but the mistakes are due to coaching issues and not talent. I think they'll turn it around very soon. I can't wait to see how the season wraps up, I'll go hunting for your power rankings and I bet it will be pretty funny then...

Good to see you taking something like a leisure rankings list for fun on a car forum to heart like someone killed your dog. Keep being so serious, because the internets are serious bidness.
Lone Sailor is offline  
post #23 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:16 PM
Resident Epicurean
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Irving
Posts: 23,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by IDAjeff View Post
Whoooooohoooooo New Orleans Saints #1 thought so....


Now the Denver Broncos.... eh not so much. LOL!

Why aren't the Redskins inhead of the Cowgirls
this is solely a board member's opinion.
bcoop is offline  
post #24 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:18 PM
Lifer
 
IDAjeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcoop View Post
Because real sports media don't do power rankings in week 1, and this is solely a board member's opinion.
Oh now I see it....


Gotta love how Denver is right up there with the Rams, Raiders, Bills, Browns & Panthers

New Orleans Saints 16-3 Super Bowl Champions 2010!!!!

Super Bowl 2011 preview

(6-3-0) New Orleans Saints......................(3-6-0) Denver Broncos
Dallas Cowboys fucking suck
IDAjeff is offline  
post #25 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:18 PM
DFWMUSTANGS.NET
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Mesquite
Posts: 2,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstng86 View Post
Why are we making power rankings after 1 week. That is idiotic.

Just sayin.
Then so is trying to predict the outcomes.

https://www.dfwstangs.net/forums/show...=422104&page=3
Lone Sailor is offline  
post #26 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:21 PM
Resident Epicurean
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Irving
Posts: 23,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by IDAjeff View Post
Oh now I see it....


Gotta love how Denver is right up there with the Rams, Raiders, Bills, Browns & Panthers
Up there? You mean down there?

Here is ESPN's power rankings.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/powerrankings
bcoop is offline  
post #27 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:21 PM
Lifer
 
mstng86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Forney, TX
Posts: 7,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lone Sailor View Post
Then so is trying to predict the outcomes.

https://www.dfwstangs.net/forums/show...=422104&page=3
hardly the same. Predicting who is going to win between two teams is not the same as predicting which teams are the best from one game out of the season.
mstng86 is offline  
post #28 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:23 PM
Lifer
 
IDAjeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lone Sailor View Post
Then so is trying to predict the outcomes.

https://www.dfwstangs.net/forums/show...=422104&page=3
I'm heavily confused....


I do predictions because it gives me insight on who and what I want to make money on.

Also for my pick em league on cbs.com

Pot is about $200 a week or so....

Plus people are bored and watch every other sports broadcaster make a bold prediction so why can't we?

I'll agree though power rankings right now is pretty stupid though.

New Orleans Saints 16-3 Super Bowl Champions 2010!!!!

Super Bowl 2011 preview

(6-3-0) New Orleans Saints......................(3-6-0) Denver Broncos
Dallas Cowboys fucking suck
IDAjeff is offline  
post #29 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:24 PM
Lifer
 
IDAjeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,334
Just curious but can I ask what you based your power rankings off of? So I can understand your logic.

New Orleans Saints 16-3 Super Bowl Champions 2010!!!!

Super Bowl 2011 preview

(6-3-0) New Orleans Saints......................(3-6-0) Denver Broncos
Dallas Cowboys fucking suck
IDAjeff is offline  
post #30 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:25 PM
Resident Epicurean
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Irving
Posts: 23,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by IDAjeff View Post
Just curious but can I ask what you based your power rankings off of? So I can understand your logic.
All it SHOULD consist of at this point is win/loss. SOS isn't really a factor because only one week has passed at this point. SOS will come in to play, along with dominance, etc, further along in the season.
bcoop is offline  
post #31 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:26 PM
Lifer
 
IDAjeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcoop View Post
Up there? You mean down there?

Here is ESPN's power rankings.

http://espn.go.com/nfl/powerrankings
Hahah I'm scrolling down so I said down there.

New Orleans Saints 16-3 Super Bowl Champions 2010!!!!

Super Bowl 2011 preview

(6-3-0) New Orleans Saints......................(3-6-0) Denver Broncos
Dallas Cowboys fucking suck
IDAjeff is offline  
post #32 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:26 PM
DFWMUSTANGS.NET
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Mesquite
Posts: 2,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstng86 View Post
hardly the same. Predicting who is going to win between two teams is not the same as predicting which teams are the best from one game out of the season.
LMFAO! I see, it's okay for you to go have your fun, but then you'll come in here and bash on others when it's not your cup of tea. Nice!!
Lone Sailor is offline  
post #33 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:27 PM
Resident Epicurean
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Irving
Posts: 23,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lone Sailor View Post
LMFAO! I see, it okay for you to go have your fun, but then you'll come in here and bash on others when it's not your cup of tea. Nice!!
No, your comparison really isn't a comparison at all.
bcoop is offline  
post #34 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:28 PM Thread Starter
Lifer
 
philsanity07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Grand Prairie
Posts: 1,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by IDAjeff View Post
Just curious but can I ask what you based your power rankings off of? So I can understand your logic.
i kinda went off on how they played in week 1 but also in the preseason and offseason leading up to this point. Thats why I put the Cowboys down there cause they didnt look like to me they improved from last year.

St. Louis Rams 4-4
rams Pictures, Images and Photos


marshall faulk Pictures, Images and Photos
philsanity07 is offline  
post #35 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:28 PM
Lifer
 
IDAjeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lone Sailor View Post
LMFAO! I see, it's okay for you to go have your fun, but then you'll come in here and bash on others when it's not your cup of tea. Nice!!
No real money involved in power rankings.... That's stupid.

Which reminds me.... Bcoop we still on for a bet?

New Orleans Saints 16-3 Super Bowl Champions 2010!!!!

Super Bowl 2011 preview

(6-3-0) New Orleans Saints......................(3-6-0) Denver Broncos
Dallas Cowboys fucking suck
IDAjeff is offline  
post #36 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:29 PM
Lifer
 
mstng86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Forney, TX
Posts: 7,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lone Sailor View Post
LMFAO! I see, it's okay for you to go have your fun, but then you'll come in here and bash on others when it's not your cup of tea. Nice!!
Not at all. have your fun, I am like bcoop though, you can't base your rankings on anything tangible right now.

In the week 1 predictions, at least you can look at talent matchups and schemes. Ranking the whole league from 1 game doesn't really make sense to me, but that is just me.
mstng86 is offline  
post #37 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:30 PM
Resident Epicurean
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Irving
Posts: 23,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by IDAjeff View Post
Which reminds me.... Bcoop we still on for a bet?
You said it yourself, man. You can't bet what you don't have.
bcoop is offline  
post #38 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:31 PM Thread Starter
Lifer
 
philsanity07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Grand Prairie
Posts: 1,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by mstng86 View Post
Not at all. have your fun, I am like bcoop though, you can't base your rankings on anything tangible right now.

In the week 1 predictions, at least you can look at talent matchups and schemes. Ranking the whole league from 1 game doesn't really make sense to me, but that is just me.
your right about that, the cream of the crop or in this case the best teams will rise to the Top around Week 4 to 5.

St. Louis Rams 4-4
rams Pictures, Images and Photos


marshall faulk Pictures, Images and Photos
philsanity07 is offline  
post #39 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:32 PM
Lifer
 
IDAjeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcoop View Post
You said it yourself, man. You can't bet what you don't have.
You're talking about 3 months from now...

I usually got $500 to spend weekly so it's up to you now.


I'll put $500 down on the New Orleans Saints winning the NFC South. AGAIN.

If Bcoop doesn't take this bet, will anyone else?

New Orleans Saints 16-3 Super Bowl Champions 2010!!!!

Super Bowl 2011 preview

(6-3-0) New Orleans Saints......................(3-6-0) Denver Broncos
Dallas Cowboys fucking suck
IDAjeff is offline  
post #40 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:33 PM
Resident Epicurean
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Irving
Posts: 23,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by IDAjeff View Post
You're talking about 3 months from now...

I usually got $500 to spend weekly so it's up to you now.


I'll put $500 down on the New Orleans Saints winning the NFC South. AGAIN.
After seeing my pick for NFCS lose to the Steelers, I'm not so sure now. lol
bcoop is offline  
post #41 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:34 PM
Lifer
 
IDAjeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcoop View Post
After seeing my pick for NFCS lose to the Steelers, I'm not so sure now. lol
Hahaha Tampa Bay won!!!!

New Orleans Saints 16-3 Super Bowl Champions 2010!!!!

Super Bowl 2011 preview

(6-3-0) New Orleans Saints......................(3-6-0) Denver Broncos
Dallas Cowboys fucking suck
IDAjeff is offline  
post #42 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:39 PM
HERE WE GO STEELERS
 
Geor!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: HERE WE GO!!!
Posts: 18,685
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcoop View Post
All it SHOULD consist of at this point is win/loss. SOS isn't really a factor because only one week has passed at this point. SOS will come in to play, along with dominance, etc, further along in the season.
Then the Cowboys should be 17, at best, according to that theory, yet, you're saying 10.

FWIW, I think 10 is good spot for them for now.

Geor! is offline  
post #43 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-14-2010, 03:46 PM
Resident Epicurean
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Irving
Posts: 23,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geor! View Post
Then the Cowboys should be 17, at best, according to that theory, yet, you're saying 10.

FWIW, I think 10 is good spot for them for now.
Like I said, 'should'. Of course what I think is going to have a little bias to it. You don't see me putting them top 3 though, after beating a bunch of spares in Philly.
bcoop is offline  
post #44 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-15-2010, 08:32 AM
Lifer
 
46Tbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 33,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lone Sailor View Post
Good to see you taking something like a leisure rankings list for fun on a car forum to heart like someone killed your dog. Keep being so serious, because the internets are serious bidness.
Oh please. Just because I typed a response doesn't mean you or your list mean more to me than a pile of Chopper's turds.

Same goes for you, Brent!
46Tbird is offline  
post #45 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-15-2010, 09:31 AM
Resident Epicurean
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Irving
Posts: 23,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by 46Tbird View Post

Same goes for you, Brent!
I'm going to piss in your rogaine bottle and replace all your viagra with blue M&Ms.
bcoop is offline  
post #46 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-15-2010, 10:02 AM
DFWMUSTANGS.NET
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Mesquite
Posts: 2,079
Quote:
Originally Posted by 46Tbird View Post
Oh please. Just because I typed a response doesn't mean you or your list mean more to me than a pile of Chopper's turds.

Same goes for you, Brent!

You not only responded, but also made points of excuse for your Cowboys and why they lost which tells me that you are bothered enough by where I put them that you felt the need to try and justify their loss, as well as blame it on the coaching staff. Which, since you brought it up, I guess I missed when Garrett and Phillips were the ones who threw that pass that led to the fumble and had it returned for a touchdown. It's obvious that the play calling sucked in that game, but the coaches can't make the players make the decisions that they make on the field. The quarterback can audible any time he feels like it or call whatever play he wants to call in the huddle and try and make something happen, but fuck it, let's just keep doing the same shit over and over since it's not working and show the coaches we can't make any decisions on our own and need our hand held throughout the entire game. But yeah, they just had the first game jitters, okay.
Lone Sailor is offline  
post #47 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-15-2010, 11:01 AM
Resident Epicurean
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Irving
Posts: 23,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lone Sailor View Post
as well as blame it on the coaching staff. Which, since you brought it up, I guess I missed when Garrett and Phillips were the ones who threw that pass that led to the fumble and had it returned for a touchdown. It's obvious that the play calling sucked in that game, but the coaches can't make the players make the decisions that they make on the field.
That's asinine. How was the fumble Romo's fault? Was he the one that fumbled the ball? I didn't think so. Ultimately, it all comes down to Choice, Garrett, and Wade.

Don't let your hate blind you to facts. It was a no win situation for Romo. Yes, a QB can audible, but would have caught hell from the coaching staff for doing so. Audibles are reserved for when the coverage is not liked. Not when the play call by Garrett was fucking retarded. Let's run through this since you don't seem to understand.

Dallas gets the ball on the Dallas 30, with :27 left on the clock. They decide to try and get some points on the board before half. No big deal.

1st down (DAL 46) -2 yd pass to Choice (checkdown option).
Incomplete to Bryant
14 yard pass to Bryant
1st down - incomplete pass, 10 yard hold penalty called.

RIGHT then and there, Garrett should have told him to take a knee. Period. End of story. At this point, there was only a matter of seconds on the clock. Nothing was going to materialize here. No good could have come from running ANY play. Instead, Red Jesus, in his infinite wisdom, decides to line up 4 wide, and send them all down the field for a hail mary. The play wasn't there. Everyone but Choice was covered. And IIRC, a Redskin defender was closing in on Romo. So it's take the sack, or toss to Choice and let him get tackled and the clock run out.


The blame lies on...

a) Choice, who was the one that fumbled the ball
b) Garrett, for not making the smart call by telling Romo to take a knee
c) Wade, for not overriding Garrett and telling Romo to take a knee

In NO way was Romo responsible for what happened. Saying he was, or trying to place blame on him is flat out ignorant, or hatred. Take your pick. So far, you're the only one I've seen that has even attempted to blame Romo for this, or say it was ultimately his fault. I watch Sportscenter, Fox Sports, and listen to the Ticket. Out of all the callers and discussion, and trust me, there has been a lot, you're the only one I've noticed that has drawn this conclusion. Think about that. Romo did the best he could, with what he was given. He can't be held accountable for terrible play calling. He can't be held for all dropped balls. Sure, he made a FEW bad passes, but what QB doesn't? I don't know if I've ever seen a 100% completion rating in a game. He even marched his team down the field, and managed the clock to PERFECTION, and threw what would have been a game winning TD had Barron not decided to play piggy back since he couldn't keep up.
bcoop is offline  
post #48 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-15-2010, 11:25 AM
Lifer
 
IDAjeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,334
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcoop View Post
That's asinine. How was the fumble Romo's fault? Was he the one that fumbled the ball? I didn't think so. Ultimately, it all comes down to Choice, Garrett, and Wade.

Don't let your hate blind you to facts. It was a no win situation for Romo. Yes, a QB can audible, but would have caught hell from the coaching staff for doing so. Audibles are reserved for when the coverage is not liked. Not when the play call by Garrett was fucking retarded. Let's run through this since you don't seem to understand.

Dallas gets the ball on the Dallas 30, with :27 left on the clock. They decide to try and get some points on the board before half. No big deal.

1st down (DAL 46) -2 yd pass to Choice (checkdown option).
Incomplete to Bryant
14 yard pass to Bryant
1st down - incomplete pass, 10 yard hold penalty called.

RIGHT then and there, Garrett should have told him to take a knee. Period. End of story. At this point, there was only a matter of seconds on the clock. Nothing was going to materialize here. No good could have come from running ANY play. Instead, Red Jesus, in his infinite wisdom, decides to line up 4 wide, and send them all down the field for a hail mary. The play wasn't there. Everyone but Choice was covered. And IIRC, a Redskin defender was closing in on Romo. So it's take the sack, or toss to Choice and let him get tackled and the clock run out.


The blame lies on...

a) Choice, who was the one that fumbled the ball
b) Garrett, for not making the smart call by telling Romo to take a knee
c) Wade, for not overriding Garrett and telling Romo to take a knee

In NO way was Romo responsible for what happened. Saying he was, or trying to place blame on him is flat out ignorant, or hatred. Take your pick. So far, you're the only one I've seen that has even attempted to blame Romo for this, or say it was ultimately his fault. I watch Sportscenter, Fox Sports, and listen to the Ticket. Out of all the callers and discussion, and trust me, there has been a lot, you're the only one I've noticed that has drawn this conclusion. Think about that. Romo did the best he could, with what he was given. He can't be held accountable for terrible play calling. He can't be held for all dropped balls. Sure, he made a FEW bad passes, but what QB doesn't? I don't know if I've ever seen a 100% completion rating in a game. He even marched his team down the field, and managed the clock to PERFECTION, and threw what would have been a game winning TD had Barron not decided to play piggy back since he couldn't keep up.


Romo should have over rided everyone and just taken a knee.... But no, he's a play maker. Lol!

New Orleans Saints 16-3 Super Bowl Champions 2010!!!!

Super Bowl 2011 preview

(6-3-0) New Orleans Saints......................(3-6-0) Denver Broncos
Dallas Cowboys fucking suck
IDAjeff is offline  
post #49 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-15-2010, 11:27 AM
Resident Epicurean
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Irving
Posts: 23,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by IDAjeff View Post
Romo should have over rided everyone and just taken a knee.... But no, he's a play maker. Lol!
Yeah, he is a playmaker. Did he or did he not march the field and put his team in a position to score a TD with the final two minute drill of the game? Dumbass.
bcoop is offline  
post #50 of 64 (permalink) Old 09-15-2010, 11:28 AM
Lifer
 
mstng86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Forney, TX
Posts: 7,612
Why don't we just agree to this:

The play to end the first half, and the final play were cluster fucks. Both were after a time out. Both had confusion. Both could have been prevented in a number of ways. All parties, Romo, Philips, and Garrett were involved. They all are to blame in some form or fashion.

Move on, next game.
mstng86 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Bookmarks

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the DFWstangs Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome