Originally Posted by SVTVenom
I'll freely admit that Gore had a breakout year and I even had him on my fantasy team, but even with that type of a year, his team still went 7-9 in a weak division that had only 1 team above .500 I find it funny that you think that only adding Nate Clements and then taking away the only half-decent WR you had in Bryant gives you any hope of them having a better season.
TO sucked back then in the fact that he was a total assclown for doing all that shit on the Star. Since then, he's finally figured out that he's going to have to play nice to get a ring and be able to get into the HOF.
Only Nate Clements? Are you fucking high? did you not read anything that has been posted or kept up with any of the moves. The only team that finished above 500 in taht division was Seattle, and they got swept by the Niners. I'd break down the upgrades on the defense for you, but you don't have a freaking clue as to the intricate details on how a defense works. You only copy and paste what analysists say, then talk about how they don't know anything.
TO sucked? Man you can't keep your foot out of your mouth to save your life. Let see, we had this discussion in 2003, so lets look at his numbers from then and even before.
2001 16 Touchdowns 1412 yards (Yikes, that ugly)
2002 13 Touchdowns 1300 yards
2003 9 Touchdowns 1102 yards
2004 14 Touchdowns 1102 yards
Goddamn, look at those awful numbers. You got me nate, TO sucked back in those days. And before you say he sucked before then
2nd year in the league 8 TD's and 936 yards. 3rd year in the league 14 TD's 1097 yards. Care to bombard us with any more ignorant statements?