A gun control law I would like - DFWstangs Forums
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
post #1 of 12 (permalink) Old 09-07-2009, 08:05 PM Thread Starter
Lifer
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,163
A gun control law I would like

I have a better idea for gun control. How about we charge the politicians with accessory to murder every time some one gets killed because they could not defend them selves because of an unconstitutional gun control law that the politician passed.


Now how do we get this put into law?


Yes I'm serious.



All men should know Honor first, above all else!

Honor is not holding your hand out for something you did not earn.
Honor is not forcing your ideas, or belief on others.
Honor is not something given to you by way of job, or title.

Honor is learned, earned, practiced and respected by all decent men and women.
tazz007 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 12 (permalink) Old 09-07-2009, 08:07 PM
DFWMUSTANGS.NET
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 3,635
Has that ever been used in court?

That is genius.
sc281_99-0135 is offline  
post #3 of 12 (permalink) Old 09-07-2009, 08:24 PM Thread Starter
Lifer
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,163
I don't know if it has been used or not.

But I would really like some contact info to get the ball rolling on this, at least in Texas.



Edit: Thanks for the compliment. How did you get my I.Q. scores?



All men should know Honor first, above all else!

Honor is not holding your hand out for something you did not earn.
Honor is not forcing your ideas, or belief on others.
Honor is not something given to you by way of job, or title.

Honor is learned, earned, practiced and respected by all decent men and women.
tazz007 is offline  
 
post #4 of 12 (permalink) Old 09-07-2009, 08:53 PM
Canada is welcome here.
 
justinsn95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ft worth
Posts: 4,039
They're all scum. Bottom feeding, parasitic scum.
justinsn95 is offline  
post #5 of 12 (permalink) Old 09-07-2009, 09:37 PM
DFW MUSTANGS . NET
 
HOOCBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DFW MUSTANGS . NET
Posts: 3,771
As great an idea as it is, no politician will EVER present a bill that could put them responsible for anything.

HOOCBB is offline  
post #6 of 12 (permalink) Old 09-07-2009, 10:09 PM Thread Starter
Lifer
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,163
Try thinking positive.

I'm sure there is more than one politician that knows how to slip something in between the cracks, they do it all the time. And I'm sure one of them would try. Any idea on who this would be, and how to contact them?

Ron Paul, or Allen Keys would be my first thought.

You got one in mind?



All men should know Honor first, above all else!

Honor is not holding your hand out for something you did not earn.
Honor is not forcing your ideas, or belief on others.
Honor is not something given to you by way of job, or title.

Honor is learned, earned, practiced and respected by all decent men and women.
tazz007 is offline  
post #7 of 12 (permalink) Old 09-08-2009, 03:24 PM
Time Served
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Land of Gar
Posts: 502
I like where you're coming from, but the first problem that jumps to mind is, how do you define an "unconstitutional" gun law? That point is at the heart of the whole debate as it is. One man's "unconstitutional" is another's "interpretation of a living document." If everybody could agree on what's constitutional and what isn't, there would be no need to pass laws naming consequences to passing unconstitutional ones, because it wouldn't happen.
vtstang66 is offline  
post #8 of 12 (permalink) Old 09-08-2009, 04:44 PM Thread Starter
Lifer
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by vtstang66 View Post
I like where you're coming from, but the first problem that jumps to mind is, how do you define an "unconstitutional" gun law? That point is at the heart of the whole debate as it is. One man's "unconstitutional" is another's "interpretation of a living document." If everybody could agree on what's constitutional and what isn't, there would be no need to pass laws naming consequences to passing unconstitutional ones, because it wouldn't happen.
Well that real easy. If you see any federal law that even has the word gun in it. Guess what, Its not legal.

At the end of 2A it clearly states. "Shall Not be infringed"

As for the ever lasting 5 year old's, debate on how very clear 2A is.

Lest just skip that, and remove the word "unconstitutional"
In short. If you pass a law prohibition me of my God given right to defend my self and I get murdered by some thug. You, the politician are guilty of accessory to murder, given the fact you voted in a law prohibiting me to properly arm, and defend myself.

Hows that?



All men should know Honor first, above all else!

Honor is not holding your hand out for something you did not earn.
Honor is not forcing your ideas, or belief on others.
Honor is not something given to you by way of job, or title.

Honor is learned, earned, practiced and respected by all decent men and women.
tazz007 is offline  
post #9 of 12 (permalink) Old 09-08-2009, 05:57 PM
CJ
User may be editing post.
 
CJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 12,013
you should watch the video of the woman addressing the senate hearing committee on her inability to carry a weapon due to (at the time) current texas gun laws about her parents being murdered in a luby's cafeteria.
CJ is offline  
post #10 of 12 (permalink) Old 09-08-2009, 06:12 PM
Canada is welcome here.
 
justinsn95's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ft worth
Posts: 4,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by HOOCBB View Post
As great an idea as it is, no politician will EVER present a bill that could put them responsible for anything.
Well they can try that all they want, and put it in all the paper they want. But we all know who it was, and what they did. So if the shit ever hits the fan, people will know who to kill lol.
justinsn95 is offline  
post #11 of 12 (permalink) Old 09-09-2009, 07:51 PM
Time Served
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Land of Gar
Posts: 502
Quote:
Originally Posted by tazz007 View Post
Well that real easy. If you see any federal law that even has the word gun in it. Guess what, Its not legal.

At the end of 2A it clearly states. "Shall Not be infringed"

As for the ever lasting 5 year old's, debate on how very clear 2A is.

Lest just skip that, and remove the word "unconstitutional"
In short. If you pass a law prohibition me of my God given right to defend my self and I get murdered by some thug. You, the politician are guilty of accessory to murder, given the fact you voted in a law prohibiting me to properly arm, and defend myself.

Hows that?
That's how you and I interpret it. But if everybody saw it so cut and dry then there wouldn't be all the controversy that there is, would there? That's why it's a debate. If you can figure out how to convince all the liberal justices who have the power to rule on these things that it's as simple as you say it is, it'll all take care of itself. That's the real problem though.

To play devil's advocate, you say it's your God given right to defend yourself. Others think it's their right for the Government to protect them by keeping guns out of the has of other people who might want to harm them. Stupid, yeah, but until you convince them they're wrong democracy will continue to work and those people will continue to influence policy.
vtstang66 is offline  
post #12 of 12 (permalink) Old 09-09-2009, 08:29 PM Thread Starter
Lifer
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 1,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by vtstang66 View Post
That's how you and I interpret it. But if everybody saw it so cut and dry then there wouldn't be all the controversy that there is, would there? That's why it's a debate. If you can figure out how to convince all the liberal justices who have the power to rule on these things that it's as simple as you say it is, it'll all take care of itself. That's the real problem though.

To play devil's advocate, you say it's your God given right to defend yourself. Others think it's their right for the Government to protect them by keeping guns out of the has of other people who might want to harm them. Stupid, yeah, but until you convince them they're wrong democracy will continue to work and those people will continue to influence policy.
But man you have to know, the only thing this gun control is about is people control.

Besides, that why I said skip that part. The 2A argument from the gun grabbers is just about a creative as a 5 year old trying to get out of trouble, and makes even less seance.

Here watch this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UW51Y...x=0&playnext=1

Simplicity made simple.



All men should know Honor first, above all else!

Honor is not holding your hand out for something you did not earn.
Honor is not forcing your ideas, or belief on others.
Honor is not something given to you by way of job, or title.

Honor is learned, earned, practiced and respected by all decent men and women.
tazz007 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
Reply

Bookmarks

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the DFWstangs Forums forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome