Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: The Land of Gar
I like where you're coming from, but the first problem that jumps to mind is, how do you define an "unconstitutional" gun law? That point is at the heart of the whole debate as it is. One man's "unconstitutional" is another's "interpretation of a living document." If everybody could agree on what's constitutional and what isn't, there would be no need to pass laws naming consequences to passing unconstitutional ones, because it wouldn't happen.