90 Notch, assume I'm one of the entended "targets" since you usually label me a Bush "hater".
I don't hate Bush, But I do believe he has made a lot of poor decisions. But in reality these decisions were were not really even his, they were decisions of the 2 men who REALLY run the country, Dick Cheney and Karl Rove.
Now WMD's, I actually wish we did find them, as it would get us "off the hook" in world opinion about why we went into Iraq.
But to me, if any decent size cache of deliverable, viable WMD's were found in Iraq, especially if they date to AFTER 1992, I would accept that as proof of Iraq's possession of WMD's.
Now I know you'll ask for a definition of "sizable cache" in terms of WMD's, but that would vary according the type of weapon. A 500lbs "dumb bomb" would not ordinarily be defined as a WMD, but id you dropped it on a 40 story office building at 2:00PM, you might kill 2000 people or more. I guess it would be along the lines of a device that can kill thousands of people by means other than intrusion (bullets, schrapnel), fire,crushing or concussions(blasts), and is easily deliverable.
But if Bush had positive proof of WMD's, it would be on every news broadcast for a solid week. I'm still waiting for the broadcast...........