Heh. Sorry about that.
Here we go:
Bible: KJV printed in 1957, and given to my father in 1964.
And when he was gone forth in to the way, there came one running, and kneeled to him, and asked him, Good Master, what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?
 And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? There is none good but one, that is, God.
 Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Defraud not, Hunour thy father and mother.
 And he answered and said unto him, Master, all these have I observed from my youth.
 Then Jesus beholding him loved him, and said unto him, One thing thou lakest: go thy way, sell whatsoever thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, take up the cross, and follow me.
 And he was sad at that saying, and went away grieved: for he had great possessions.
 And Jesus looked round about, and saith unto his disciples, How hardly shall they that have riches enter into the kingdom of God!
 And the disciples were astonished at his words. But Jesus answereth again, and saith unto them, Children, how hard is it for them that trust in riches to enter into the kingdom of God!
 It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.
 And they were astonished out of measure, saying among themselves, Who then can be saved?
 And Jesus looking upon them saith, With men it is impossible, but not with God: for with God all things are possible.
Now, I know this is before the resurrection. And I'm only using the quotes from St. Mark, because they are only slightly different in St. Matthew, and St. Luke (Chap 19 in St. Matthew, and I believe Chap 12 in St. Luke, though I could be wrong there).
The main reason I quote from before the resurrection is that there is no mention that only through Jesus can you be saved, even after the accounts of the resurrection. However, in St. John, it's all over the place that "In Jesus name", "in my name", etc. Even before the resurrection.
So my point is, 3 of 4 say one thing, while 1 of 4 says something else ... yet that 1 is the one quoted, and adhered to as the rule. Being as they are all 4 in the same Bible, are we to believe only the one, and leave the other 3 to be contradictions ... but then again, we can't have the Bible containing any contradictions ... so we get back to my earlier, and central point that the Bible is not meant to have everything be taken in the literal. That it is open for interpretation.