God is no longer a man, says Scottish Episcopal church
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz0yoA7SMJL
The Scottish Episcopal Church has caused controversy by removing masculine references to God in a new order of service.
The new form of worship, which removes words such as 'Lord, he, his, him' and 'mankind' from services, has been written by the church in an attempt to acknowledge that God is 'beyond human gender'.
Episcopalian bishops have approved the introduction of more 'inclusive' language, which deliberately removes references suggesting that God is of male gender
Traditionalists have criticised the changes on the grounds that they smack of political correctness and because they believe they are not consistent with the teachings of the Bible.
The alterations have been made to provide an alternative to the established 1982 Liturgy, which, like the Bible, refers to God as a man.
The new order of service, which can be used by priests if they have difficulties with a male God, has been produced by the church's Liturgy Committee in consultation with the Faith & Order Board of General Synod and the College of Bishops.
The controversial changes were discussed at the church's General Synod recently. The minutes of the synod reveal that female priests had asked why God was still referred to as a man.
The altered version of the 1982 Liturgy sees masculine pronouns removed when they refer to God and the new approach has even been extended to humans.
For example, the word 'mankind' has been taken out and replaced with 'world'.
Some senior religious figures have objected to the new form of words.
More...Archbishop of Canterbury hits back after Stephen Hawking insists God did NOT create the universe
'It is political correctness,' said Rev Stuart Hall of the Scottish Prayer Book Society and Honorary Professor of Divinity at the University of St Andrews
'It is quite unnecessary. The word man in English - especially among scientists - is inclusive of both sexes.
'Those who try to minimise references to God as the Father and Christ as his Son have great difficulties, because the New Testament is shot through with these references.'
Direct quotations from the Bible have been spared change, because of a reluctance to interfere with the word of God.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#ixzz0yo9cauPR