Excuse me guys, for some reason you all have a superiority complex. Mustang does not equal greatness. And if yours is modified, and you beat a stock car, does it really make a difference? Kinda goes up there with saying "my heavily modified mustang will beat your stock camaro" with a reply of, "ok, after you beat my stock camaro, you can race my stock F-16."
If im not mistaking, by 1990 the Mustang GT, and an IROCZ L98 were almost a dead match in the 1/4. With the IROC being the most pleasurable to drive of the 2, and being able to out handle the GT by a landslide. And as far as my preference goes, I prefer the f-body to the mustang due to its performance and its design. It has a more vintage muscle car look than the mustang, which looks like a fly on a winshield.
You can try to burn me all you want but the proof is there, reviews have been made, in the late 80's and early 90's the 3rd gen f-body finally got more performance and since 93 to 02 the f-body danced circles around the mustang. Funny, now that there is no competition, ford is comming out with all these diffrent versions of the mustang. BTW, the f-body may not be made anymore, but its far from extinct.
Last edited by tpi5.7ATETHE5.0; 09-10-2003 at 07:53 AM.