Isosceles or Weaver?

propellerhead · 01-19-2007, 02:13 PM

Which stance do you use at the range and why?

Johnsredgt50 · 01-19-2007, 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by propellerhead

Which stance do you use at the range and why?

Modified Isosceles!
Beter movement and bone support/structure for your follow up shots. Weaver is a thing of the past.

JP135 · 01-19-2007, 02:36 PM

Weaver. Started using it when I was a wee pup in the academy. Three reasons come to mind: 1-I feel like I control the recoil better with the left forefinger on the trigger guard and I get back on target quicker. 2-I feel like I can engage multiple targets without as much body movement. 3-In close quarters, I can keep my stance without sticking the pistol so far in front of me where some fool might try to grab it.

But it's personal preference and what works for you. They both work. Whatever allows you to be comfortable and focus.

Jester · 01-19-2007, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by propellerhead

Which stance do you use at the range and why?

Chapman stance............which is a modfied weaver stance. It just feels right with my long arms.

Johnsredgt50 · 01-19-2007, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jester

Chapman stance............which is a modfied weaver stance. It just feels right with my long arms.

I bet you could suck a golf ball through a garden hose with that gay stance!

Jester · 01-19-2007, 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnsredgt50

I bet you could suck a golf ball through a garden hose with that gay stance!

hehehehe, maybe so!
That is just for the range, but when sneakin thru the house to see if a bad guy is there, I have the gun held the same way except my hand are touching my chest in order to shove the gun forward into an attacker if he jumps out.

Casper · 01-19-2007, 03:14 PM

For accuracy I lay down in a frog position, which is a modified creedmore. Otherwise I just use whatever feels right that day.

SlowLX · 01-19-2007, 03:17 PM

Isosceles, I don't like weaver it just doesn't feel right to me

Jester · 01-19-2007, 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SlowLX

Isosceles, I don't like weaver it just doesn't feel right to me

Yeah, it is all about whatever feels the best to you and keeps them tight.

ThreeFingerPete · 01-19-2007, 03:26 PM

I shoot from the hip.

usmcluke · 01-19-2007, 03:33 PM

I'm a weaver just because I was taught before body armor was prevalent. Smaller target for my opponent. John has me about ready to try the modified isosceles like he uses. He is a hell of a shooter.

Johnsredgt50 · 01-19-2007, 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by usmcluke

I'm a weaver just because I was taught before body armor was prevalent. Smaller target for my opponent. John has me about ready to try the modified isosceles like he uses. He is a hell of a shooter.

Luke aint that bad himself.....he is damn good at 3 yds LOL.

All 3 of us could have done a lot better if it wasnt 30* outside!

Ronin6135 · 01-19-2007, 06:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnsredgt50

Modified Isosceles!
Beter movement and bone support/structure for your follow up shots. Weaver is a thing of the past.

Picture of what it looks like or description????

I was tought the weaver in my firearms class.

Johnsredgt50 · 01-20-2007, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronin6135

Picture of what it looks like or description????

I was tought the weaver in my firearms class.

Its pretty much an Isosceles stance with stepped(sp?) footing like the weaver but not as extreme. I will see if I can find a pic.

Weaver is a push/pull stance and grip. Why would you want to pull on something that is recoiling in the same direction? It makes for shitty follow up shots.

How old was the guy teaching your class?

Ronin6135 · 01-20-2007, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnsredgt50

Its pretty much an Isosceles stance with stepped(sp?) footing like the weaver but not as extreme. I will see if I can find a pic.

Weaver is a push/pull stance and grip. Why would you want to pull on something that is recoiling in the same direction? It makes for shitty follow up shots.

How old was the guy teaching your class?

Mid 50's maybe.

Johnsredgt50 · 01-20-2007, 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronin6135

Mid 50's maybe.

Yeah thats what I thought.

99SVTour · 01-21-2007, 03:48 AM

Isosceles pic anyone cause I got no clue wtf yall are talking about. I shoot from several different positions and with each hand alone at the range because you never know what kind of cover will be available if you get into a bad situation. Maybe that's just me that does that?

Casper · 01-22-2007, 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnsredgt50

Why would you want to pull on something that is recoiling in the same direction? It makes for shitty follow up shots.

Accuracy. Leave that sloppy stuff for the redneck rentacop wannabes. Besides, you can take your time and reload a second round for a follow-up if you close to within 200m.

Johnsredgt50 · 01-22-2007, 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Casper

Accuracy. Leave that sloppy stuff for the redneck rentacop wannabes. Besides, you can take your time and reload a second round for a follow-up if you close to within 200m.

? Im lost

Casper · 01-23-2007, 10:11 AM

I was making fun of your anti-weaver bias

You have a great point in a defense situation (which is assumed by the wording of the original post), but you generally won't find anyone using any kind of isoscoles stance in bullseye or sillhouette. Of course, follow-up is not an issue in those situations, nor in hunting.

Johnsredgt50 · 01-23-2007, 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Casper

I was making fun of your anti-weaver bias

You have a great point in a defense situation (which is assumed by the wording of the original post), but you generally won't find anyone using any kind of isoscoles stance in bullseye or sillhouette. Of course, follow-up is not an issue in those situations, nor in hunting.

We are talking handguns. No 200yd shot there. I think your lost now

Casper · 01-23-2007, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnsredgt50

We are talking handguns. No 200yd shot there. I think your lost now

Still haven't been to a sillhouette match, huh? hehe.

Speaking of matches, do you know of any pin shooting in the metroplex? I've always wanted to do that.

01-19-2007, 02:13 PM	#1
propellerhead The token Asian guy Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: SBRacing Posts: 7,900	Isosceles or Weaver? Which stance do you use at the range and why? __________________

01-19-2007, 02:36 PM	#3
JP135 Num say'n? (tm) Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 5,143	Weaver. Started using it when I was a wee pup in the academy. Three reasons come to mind: 1-I feel like I control the recoil better with the left forefinger on the trigger guard and I get back on target quicker. 2-I feel like I can engage multiple targets without as much body movement. 3-In close quarters, I can keep my stance without sticking the pistol so far in front of me where some fool might try to grab it. But it's personal preference and what works for you. They both work. Whatever allows you to be comfortable and focus. Last edited by JP135; 01-19-2007 at 02:42 PM.

01-19-2007, 03:17 PM	#8
SlowLX Wolverines!!! Join Date: May 2002 Location: 1st Civ Div Posts: 8,673	Isosceles, I don't like weaver it just doesn't feel right to me __________________ <a href="http://www.countdownr.com">Countdownr</a>

01-19-2007, 03:26 PM	#10
ThreeFingerPete Hired Hand Join Date: Sep 2002 Posts: 13,670	I shoot from the hip. __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

01-19-2007, 03:14 PM	#7
Casper Lifer Join Date: Mar 2000 Location: Euless, TX Posts: 9,508	For accuracy I lay down in a frog position, which is a modified creedmore. Otherwise I just use whatever feels right that day.

01-21-2007, 03:48 AM	#17
99SVTour Thread Kill Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Irving Posts: 3,250	Isosceles pic anyone cause I got no clue wtf yall are talking about. I shoot from several different positions and with each hand alone at the range because you never know what kind of cover will be available if you get into a bad situation. Maybe that's just me that does that?

01-23-2007, 10:11 AM	#20
Casper Lifer Join Date: Mar 2000 Location: Euless, TX Posts: 9,508	I was making fun of your anti-weaver bias You have a great point in a defense situation (which is assumed by the wording of the original post), but you generally won't find anyone using any kind of isoscoles stance in bullseye or sillhouette. Of course, follow-up is not an issue in those situations, nor in hunting.