Sarah's palin' around with drug dealers?

[gpamp]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2008/12/19/levi-johnstons-mother-arrested-drug-charges/

I would like to know why the Governor of Alaska has been palin' around with drug dealers. What did she know? WHAT DID SHE KNOW??

I love guilt by association. It bites everyone in the ass.

[bcoop]

Anyone ever told you you're like a bad case of herpes?

[blackjack]

wonder if she was getting a discount?

[Magnus]

Gpamp needed to remind everyone how much of a 3 job, low income, sorry sack of shit failure he is. Thanks for meeting your quota!

Now, here's where you get to see what someone SHOULD do when it comes to light one of their acquaintances is a known criminal. It would also be a much different case if the woman apologized for her actions, and received corrective action for them.

Then, you'd probably see Palin acknowledge what the woman has done, and distance herself, instead of increasing their friendship, and then making excuses for it, and lying about it (cough, ayers*obama, cough).

[46Tbird]

Yeah, cause being found in possession of six doobies is the same as organizing bombings, riots, and a jailbreak.

[Bubbaearl]

whats sad is he's going to look up and be 50 and still fucking stupid . sad very sad. such a waste of good oxygen .

[CTs2fast96GT]

You pull that out of the british newspapers too you stupid mother fucker? :rolleyes:

[gpamp]

Gpamp needed to remind everyone how much of a 3 job, low income, sorry sack of shit failure he is. Thanks for meeting your quota!

Now, here's where you get to see what someone SHOULD do when it comes to light one of their acquaintances is a known criminal. It would also be a much different case if the woman apologized for her actions, and received corrective action for them.

Then, you'd probably see Palin acknowledge what the woman has done, and distance herself, instead of increasing their friendship, and then making excuses for it, and lying about it (cough, ayers*obama, cough).
I'm just using your same criteria against your hero. Sorry you got so angry. Please don't rip anyone apart.

[Cartman]

Yeah, cause being found in possession of six doobies is the same as organizing bombings, riots, and a jailbreak.
would that be a double standard? both are criminals why is one crime worse then the other? :confused:

[Magnus]

I'm just using your same criteria against your hero. Sorry you got so angry. Please don't rip anyone apart.
No, you're not. You're being an idiot, that's all you're doing.

Your twisted left mind somehow sees this as equal footing, as of Palin is endorsing this woman. Point# 1 that you're fucked on.

Point#2 would be to compare her minor drug charge to killing us citizens in planned bombings.

Thank you for once again proving how fucked the extreme liberal left's type of thinking is.

would that be a double standard? both are criminals why is one crime worse then the other? :confused:
Are you fucking serious?
Are you saying there is a comparison between taking candy from a store and multiple homicidal acts of terrorism?

Wow, what a dumb fuck.

[Paladin]

would that be a double standard? both are criminals why is one crime worse then the other? :confused:

Siding with gpamp huh? No, you are not liberal at all. LOL

[Cartman]

No, you're not. You're being an idiot, that's all you're doing.

Your twisted left mind somehow sees this as equal footing, as of Palin is endorsing this woman. Point# 1 that you're fucked on.

Point#2 would be to compare her minor drug charge to killing us citizens in planned bombings.

Thank you for once again proving how fucked the extreme liberal left's type of thinking is.


Are you fucking serious?
Are you saying there is a comparison between taking candy from a store and multiple homicidal acts of terrorism?

Wow, what a dumb fuck.

no I am saying both are felonies, you are saying one is a misdemeanor and one is a felony, big difference. but drugs kill people, as do bombs seems to me that they would be the same.

[Cartman]

Siding with gpamp huh? No, you are not liberal at all. LOL
if you want to say that I am siding with him because of the double standard thrown out, then sure. That is like saying all men are equal, execpt for the black man. Of course in your world that is more than likely how you see it. :(

[Paladin]

if you want to say that I am siding with him because of the double standard thrown out, then sure. That is like saying all men are equal, execpt for the black man. Of course in your world that is more than likely how you see it. :(

You bring race into the discussion for what reason?

[Magnus]

no I am saying both are felonies, you are saying one is a misdemeanor and one is a felony, big difference. but drugs kill people, as do bombs seems to me that they would be the same.
Seems to me you're a fucking lunatic.

"Troopers released no other information, including the kind or amount of drugs, because details could jeopardize an ongoing investigation, spokeswoman Megan Peters said."


Where did you see intent to distribute, or any other indication that she had her mind set on intentionally harming, and killing other people?

The crimes are very different, and deserve very different treatment. Hence the reason that even if two crimes are a felony, they will have (usually) seperate minimums and maximums of punishment.

[Cartman]

You bring race into the discussion for what reason?
had to go with something you would know and understand :D

[46Tbird]

Cartman, if your posts are serious, I am convinced that you are suffering from mental illness.

[Cartman]

Seems to me you're a fucking lunatic.

"Troopers released no other information, including the kind or amount of drugs, because details could jeopardize an ongoing investigation, spokeswoman Megan Peters said."


Where did you see intent to distribute, or any other indication that she had her mind set on intentionally harming, and killing other people?

The crimes are very different, and deserve very different treatment. Hence the reason that even if two crimes are a felony, they will have (usually) seperate minimums and maximums of punishment.
well that depends on what state you live in, but it is true they are different but both are crimes both can kill people, do you agree with that?

it may be for her own use, but she does have kids that live with her, and that could lead to her kids getting into drugs, becoming addicted, etc...

[Vertnut]

well that depends on what state you live in, but it is true they are different but both are crimes both can kill people, do you agree with that?

it may be for her own use, but she does have kids that live with her, and that could lead to her kids getting into drugs, becoming addicted, etc...
You are really reaching now. I told you a long time ago, to stick to Arkansas football. It sucks, but at least you understand it.

[5.0LiterRiceEater]

Who has the pic of gpamp's fat ass with his band of fags?

[96lasersnake]

Have you forgotten?

http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j311/96lasersnake/poster865964.jpg

[Blackedout01gt]

no I am saying both are felonies, you are saying one is a misdemeanor and one is a felony, big difference. but drugs kill people, as do bombs seems to me that they would be the same.

Running from the cops is also a felony, even if you are running for the fun of it. Granted, most people run because they have a bigger reason to run (other felonies etc.). So, what you are trying to say is that if I ran from the cops in my car for no other reason than to see if I could get away and they catch me, then I should face the same charges as a man who blew up buildings? :confused:

You left wingers never cease to amaze me. You are a fucking idiot.

[Blackedout01gt]

well that depends on what state you live in, but it is true they are different but both are crimes both can kill people, do you agree with that?

it may be for her own use, but she does have kids that live with her, and that could lead to her kids getting into drugs, becoming addicted, etc...


There is your key work.

[5.0LiterRiceEater]

Have you forgotten?

http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j311/96lasersnake/poster865964.jpg

lmfao!!!! I searched and couldnt find it. We need to make it a point to post this pic every time "Fat Kid love Cake" posts.

[Paladin]

had to go with something you would know and understand :D

Almost as bad as someone blindly throwing out child molestation. You and gpamp are in a league all your own with your "slams". gpamp has child molesting on hs brain and you have racism. Peas in a pod you guys are!

[gpamp]

It cracks me up when you guys have to get personal with your attacks because you're so taken aback by someone disagreeing with you and calling your heroes out for the criminals they are.

Are you guys going to do the Ben Stein when Bush gets charged with war crimes in a UN court and defend him as Benny defended Nixon? You guys want to screw Sarah Palin so badly that when I throw out banter about her daughter's future mother-in-law might be selling drugs, that you throw out personal attacks?

It sure makes you look douchey when you do that. And pathetic. And desperate. (she's not going to fuck you.) (neither is W. stop pretending he was a good president)

[gpamp]

No, you're not. You're being an idiot, that's all you're doing.

Your twisted left mind somehow sees this as equal footing, as of Palin is endorsing this woman. Point# 1 that you're fucked on.

Point#2 would be to compare her minor drug charge to killing us citizens in planned bombings.

Thank you for once again proving how fucked the extreme liberal left's type of thinking is.


Are you fucking serious?
Are you saying there is a comparison between taking candy from a store and multiple homicidal acts of terrorism?

Wow, what a dumb fuck.
You call me a dumb fuck, after saying something that's been proven over and over to be untrue. Was it all the e-mails sent out to simple-minded people, hoping they'd believe that Obama was a Muslim that got you? The Weather Underground never planned to hurt citizens, or people for that matter. And the only people killed in their bombings, were a few members of the group who had an accident while making the devices. Not only that... but trying to tie them to Obama is what makes Sarah being related (by marriage) to a drug dealer, a big deal. (the irony of it all)

Dumb fuck.

[Paladin]

Cartman, if your posts are serious, I am convinced that you are suffering from mental illness.

I may have to use this as my sig for awhile. LOL

[Paladin]

Running from the cops is also a felony, even if you are running for the fun of it. Granted, most people run because they have a bigger reason to run (other felonies etc.). So, what you are trying to say is that if I ran from the cops in my car for no other reason than to see if I could get away and they catch me, then I should face the same charges as a man who blew up buildings? :confused:

You left wingers never cease to amaze me. You are a fucking idiot.

Cartman is no left winger, he is a free thinker. :rolleyes:

[Magnus]

well that depends on what state you live in, but it is true they are different but both are crimes both can kill people, do you agree with that?

it may be for her own use, but she does have kids that live with her, and that could lead to her kids getting into drugs, becoming addicted, etc...
Ok moron, let me clear something up for you.

Lets say she did intend to distribute. . . . .
Even then, there is a difference between "Hey, you know this stuff could kill you, do you still want to buy it?" and "Fuck those mother fuckers, we're going to bomb them, kill them all, and leave their families in pain and misery as we do the legal dance, and get away with killing all of those goddamn sons of bitches! FUCK THEM! UNDERGROuND FOR THE WIN!"

The difference isn't what "can" happen, but what was "intended" to happen.

You call me a dumb fuck, after saying something that's been proven over and over to be untrue. Was it all the e-mails sent out to simple-minded people, hoping they'd believe that Obama was a Muslim that got you? The Weather Underground never planned to hurt citizens, or people for that matter. And the only people killed in their bombings, were a few members of the group who had an accident while making the devices. Not only that... but trying to tie them to Obama is what makes Sarah being related (by marriage) to a drug dealer, a big deal. (the irony of it all)

Dumb fuck.
Wow, how much more retarded can you get?
Surely there is a point where we can legally declare you mentally handicapped, and have you restrained to your home so that others can live without fear of a retard beating them up, or spontaneously trying to suck their dick.

[Shaithis]

You call me a dumb fuck, after saying something that's been proven over and over to be untrue. Was it all the e-mails sent out to simple-minded people, hoping they'd believe that Obama was a Muslim that got you? The Weather Underground never planned to hurt citizens, or people for that matter. And the only people killed in their bombings, were a few members of the group who had an accident while making the devices. Not only that... but trying to tie them to Obama is what makes Sarah being related (by marriage) to a drug dealer, a big deal. (the irony of it all)

Dumb fuck.

Oh so since they didn't plan on hurting anyone, that makes it ok? A bloodless bombing of a government building is ok as long as noone was injured is ok with you?

I just can't believe that all the liberals are so blinded by the half truths, propaganda, and media brainwashing. Its sad to see a group of people hate what thier forefathers fought so hard for. :(

[Zarathustra]

It's funny you guys can't hang with his arguments, so you move to attack him and destroy his credibility.

Classic tactics for the loser of an argument.

[Shaithis]

It's funny you guys can't hang with his arguments, so you move to attack him and destroy his credibility.

Classic tactics for the loser of an argument.

Blanket statments ftl. I've already shown Cartman to be less than effective in a debate.

[Zarathustra]

Blanket statments ftl. I've already shown Cartman to be less than effective in a debate.

Oh, right. I was talking about gpamp, and I agree with you.

[Paladin]

Oh, right. I was talking about gpamp, and I agree with you.

gpamp has been shown many times to be a bigger idiot than you are. I doubt either of you will find that comforting, but it is the truth.

[Cartman]

Ok moron, let me clear something up for you.

Lets say she did intend to distribute. . . . .
Even then, there is a difference between "Hey, you know this stuff could kill you, do you still want to buy it?" and "Fuck those mother fuckers, we're going to bomb them, kill them all, and leave their families in pain and misery as we do the legal dance, and get away with killing all of those goddamn sons of bitches! FUCK THEM! UNDERGROuND FOR THE WIN!"

The difference isn't what "can" happen, but what was "intended" to happen.





so how you kill someone, not manslaughter, depends on how bad it is? are you kidding me. So if somebody gave your mom some pure coke and it caused her to die, you are saying 10yrs and all is forgiven? But if your mom dies in a bomb then he should hang, does this sum up your logic? Funny how all the so called conservatives, want to side with the liberals on how the law should work, when it is their ass in the sling. Let me guess you are now against the death penalty :rolleyes:

[forever_frost]

Actually, drugs are often called victimless crimes because the victim is consenting to engage in the activity that kills them. For better or worse and I am speaking as someone who's aunt, brother and father all almost died due to drug use and/or overdose. Comparing that to someone who knowingly and intentionally sets explosives to destroy property and/or lives is like comparing speeding to genocide. While it's possible if you stretch the boundries, it's not logical to do so.

Bashing on Palin and her family due to this, while ignoring the guilty associations of Obama and the evil that his acquaintances have done, either the blatant racisim of Wright or the attempted destruction of government property and possibly the extinguishing of lives by Ayers is foolish and shows a lack of upper level reasoning. I would suggest speaking with a mental health professional immediately if you are unable to see that these are worse than those associations of a ex vice presidential nominee. Since Obama is about in the White House, careful attention should be paid him and his affiliations as it carries real world and current threats to not only our public face that we present the world, but also the possibility for dangerous reprocussions on our own soil.

[Cartman]

Actually, drugs are often called victimless crimes because the victim is consenting to engage in the activity that kills them. For better or worse and I am speaking as someone who's aunt, brother and father all almost died due to drug use and/or overdose. Comparing that to someone who knowingly and intentionally sets explosives to destroy property and/or lives is like comparing speeding to genocide. While it's possible if you stretch the boundries, it's not logical to do so.

Bashing on Palin and her family due to this, while ignoring the guilty associations of Obama and the evil that his acquaintances have done, either the blatant racisim of Wright or the attempted destruction of government property and possibly the extinguishing of lives by Ayers is foolish and shows a lack of upper level reasoning. I would suggest speaking with a mental health professional immediately if you are unable to see that these are worse than those associations of a ex vice presidential nominee. Since Obama is about in the White House, careful attention should be paid him and his affiliations as it carries real world and current threats to not only our public face that we present the world, but also the possibility for dangerous reprocussions on our own soil.

lol @drugs are often called victimless crimes because the victim is consenting to engage in the activity that kills them

nobody is saying anything about obama other than people bash him for who he has known and want to give palin a pass on the same thing. It isn't supporting obama, it is showing how people only choose to see what they want to see when it fits their argument.

If this story was about obama pally and crew would be all over it screaming for his head. I just called it to their attention

[Pro88LX]

would that be a double standard? both are criminals why is one crime worse then the other? :confused:

so by your extremely flawed logic, or lack thereof, would you say driving with no insurance is as bad as murder?

[Magnus]

so how you kill someone, not manslaughter, depends on how bad it is? are you kidding me. So if somebody gave your mom some pure coke and it caused her to die, you are saying 10yrs and all is forgiven? But if your mom dies in a bomb then he should hang, does this sum up your logic? Funny how all the so called conservatives, want to side with the liberals on how the law should work, when it is their ass in the sling. Let me guess you are now against the death penalty :rolleyes:
Holy fuck you're an idiot.

My mom did the coke, that that's her fault. No one forced it on her.


Do you blame guns for suicides too? What a fucking loser.

[jyro]

sound board.

Hendrick
Upcoming local shows
Granada Theater, Saturday, January 10
http://www.pegasusnews.com/bands/hendrick/

[forever_frost]

lol @drugs are often called victimless crimes because the victim is consenting to engage in the activity that kills them

nobody is saying anything about obama other than people bash him for who he has known and want to give palin a pass on the same thing. It isn't supporting obama, it is showing how people only choose to see what they want to see when it fits their argument.

If this story was about obama pally and crew would be all over it screaming for his head. I just called it to their attention

Actually, what I've been seeing is when Obama's associations are put out in public view, there is a scream that "It doesn't matter!!!" and "Just because that person is bad, doesn't mean Obama is!" While yall may call for Palin's head because of her daughter's baby's daddy's mother (wow that's long), why don't you start screaming for Obama's head for Ayers, Wright, Farakan and the rest of the ilk? Before you can remove the splinter in our eye, might want to pay attention to the 4x4 in yours.

[gpamp]

Oh so since they didn't plan on hurting anyone, that makes it ok? A bloodless bombing of a government building is ok as long as noone was injured is ok with you?

I just can't believe that all the liberals are so blinded by the half truths, propaganda, and media brainwashing. Its sad to see a group of people hate what thier forefathers fought so hard for. :(
See, the problem with your statement is this... you say that I'm "blinded by the half truths, propaganda, and media brainwashing." However, you're dealing with half truth when you say "Obama hung out with guys that tried to hurt American citizens.", then the truth is pointed out that they didn't try to hurt anyone, and didn't... which you follow up with "oh, since they didn't plan on hurting anyone, that makes it ok?" You have to see the irony with you using a half truth to say that I'm blinded by them, right? Oops. I mean hypocrisy, not irony.

For you to say "its sad to see a group of people hate what their (not thier) forefathers fought so hard for" is yet another half truth and propaganda statement. You say it like you hold the truth. As if your opinion (right-leaning) is the right one. I don't think the forefathers would've ok'd warrantless wiretaps on American citizens (including groups who's only crime might've been disagreeing with the President). Since I'm pretty sure you'd validate the wiretap decision, I can honestly say it's hard to see someone who hates what his forefathers fought so hard for. How dare you, sir.

[Pro88LX]

See, the problem with your statement is this... you say that I'm "blinded by the half truths, propaganda, and media brainwashing." However, you're dealing with half truth when you say "Obama hung out with guys that tried to hurt American citizens.", then the truth is pointed out that they didn't try to hurt anyone, and didn't... which you follow up with "oh, since they didn't plan on hurting anyone, that makes it ok?" You have to see the irony with you using a half truth to say that I'm blinded by them, right? Oops. I mean hypocrisy, not irony.

For you to say "its sad to see a group of people hate what their (not thier) forefathers fought so hard for" is yet another half truth and propaganda statement. You say it like you hold the truth. As if your opinion (right-leaning) is the right one. I don't think the forefathers would've ok'd warrantless wiretaps on American citizens (including groups who's only crime might've been disagreeing with the President). Since I'm pretty sure you'd validate the wiretap decision, I can honestly say it's hard to see someone who hates what his forefathers fought so hard for. How dare you, sir.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wKjxFJfcrcA&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wKjxFJfcrcA&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

[Paladin]

Actually, what I've been seeing is when Obama's associations are put out in public view, there is a scream that "It doesn't matter!!!" and "Just because that person is bad, doesn't mean Obama is!" While yall may call for Palin's head because of her daughter's baby's daddy's mother (wow that's long), why don't you start screaming for Obama's head for Ayers, Wright, Farakan and the rest of the ilk? Before you can remove the splinter in our eye, might want to pay attention to the 4x4 in yours.

Another inconvenient truth about our liberal friends. LOL

I sure would be calling Palin out if she had a racist pastor who she chose as an advisor, a friend who was a domestic terrorist, and several other poor associations, but all the liberals have is her daughter's future MIL as a bad association. How pathetic it must be if this is all you can come up with. I almost feel bad for the hypocritical liberals. :rolleyes:

[black01gt]

gpamp, I don't pick on you but your point in this thread can only be to stir some shit. no?

[Vertnut]

Another inconvenient truth about our liberal friends. LOL

I sure would be calling Palin out if she had a racist pastor who she chose as an advisor, a friend who was a domestic terrorist, and several other poor associations, but all the liberals have is her daughter's future MIL as a bad association. How pathetic it must be if this is all you can come up with. I almost feel bad for the hypocritical liberals. :rolleyes:
Especially after send a plane-load of spies up to Alaska to do nothing but dig up bullshit on a good lady. :cool: They found NOTHING. The "trooper-gate" issue was NOTHING. She will be back (if she ever "goes away") and libs will pay dearly for the way she was treated.

[Vertnut]

gpamp, I don't pick on you but your point in this thread can only be to stir some shit. no?
I thought that was his only point all the time! He's not in the real world that most of us live in.

[Paladin]

Especially after send a plane-load of spies up to Alaska to do nothing but dig up bullshit on a good lady. :cool: They found NOTHING. The "trooper-gate" issue was NOTHING. She will be back (if she ever "goes away") and libs will pay dearly for the way she was treated.

The experience issue will have been addressed by then, so they will have nothing. It will be interesting to see if she is around in a few years to run.

[Bubbaearl]

hey , it could be worse. gpamp could be her son-in-law . :eek:

[Somewhere in Time]

Have you forgotten?

http://i83.photobucket.com/albums/j311/96lasersnake/poster865964.jpg

Someone needs to make an EPIC FAIL out of this one. Classic!! LOL

[Mr Majestyk]

It cracks me up when you guys have to get personal with your attacks because you're so taken aback by someone disagreeing with you and calling your heroes out for the criminals they are.

Are you guys going to do the Ben Stein when Bush gets charged with war crimes in a UN court and defend him as Benny defended Nixon? You guys want to screw Sarah Palin so badly that when I throw out banter about her daughter's future mother-in-law might be selling drugs, that you throw out personal attacks?

It sure makes you look douchey when you do that. And pathetic. And desperate. (she's not going to fuck you.) (neither is W. stop pretending he was a good president)

UN Court LOL

Thanks for again showing your stupidity, you fucking cunt.

[gpamp]

gpamp, I don't pick on you but your point in this thread can only be to stir some shit. no?
Yes, but only using the same methods the right wingers in here use to post threads.

[Paladin]

hey , it could be worse. gpamp could be her son-in-law . :eek:

No way, that girl is pretty and intelligent. Fat goofy guys would have no chance getting any of that. :D

[whiteboy]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2008/12/19/levi-johnstons-mother-arrested-drug-charges/

I would like to know why the Governor of Alaska has been palin' around with drug dealers. What did she know? WHAT DID SHE KNOW??

I love guilt by association. It bites everyone in the ass.



Just end yourself

[Nate]

Just end yourself
God damn...when Whiteboy is telling you to kill yourself that's fucking sad.

[blownragtop]

Sarah Palin’s daughter’s boyfriend’s mother is busted for drugs (marijuana?).

VS.

Obama’s personal drug use (marijuana/cocaine).
Obama’s sorted history with domestic terrorists.
Obama’s 20+ year membership in a racist Black Nationalist church.
Obama’s long history of consorting with anti-capitalist Marxists.
Then, of course, there are questions involving Obama’s rapid rise to power in the corrupt Illinois/Chicago machine.
And even more questions about the legitimacy of his candidacy – such as his refusal to release his ORIGINAL birth certificate.

I guess I can see why Pampers has such a fascination with Palin – he needs to deflect attention away from the tarnishing messiah. It’s going to be a very long 4 years for the Democrats.

[mightyp]

hey , it could be worse. gpamp could be her son-in-law . :eek:


couldn't happen, she doesn't have a gay son for him to marry.

[sc281_99-0135]

couldn't happen, she doesn't have a gay son for him to marry.



and even if she did, weve already made it illegal anyhow ;)

PROP 8 FTW

[Pro88LX]

and even if she did, weve already made it illegal anyhow ;)

PROP 8 FTW

you know prop 8 was in california only right?

[sc281_99-0135]

you know prop 8 was in california only right?


yes i do, and if prop8 could pass in a sausage fest like cali, i think its safe to assume it has a fighting chance anyywhere else.

i've got no prob with gay marriage, it just helps.

the leftists can either chose to outlaw coal, oil and other alternative fuels production except solar, (cause they dont like wind anymore cause it hurts birds )and ensure that we are assraped by gas prices again, or they can save gay marriage.

either way, their attention is divided, and thats a good thing for everybody.

[Hmbre97]

So we're supposed to care that the mother of her future son-in-law was busted with drugs but Obama gets a pass for smoking weed and doing coke?

Logic FAIL

[Shaithis]

See, the problem with your statement is this... you say that I'm "blinded by the half truths, propaganda, and media brainwashing." However, you're dealing with half truth when you say "Obama hung out with guys that tried to hurt American citizens.", then the truth is pointed out that they didn't try to hurt anyone, and didn't... which you follow up with "oh, since they didn't plan on hurting anyone, that makes it ok?" You have to see the irony with you using a half truth to say that I'm blinded by them, right? Oops. I mean hypocrisy, not irony..

Don't put words in my mouth. I didn't anywhere say "Obama hung out with guys that tried to hurt American citizens.". :rolleyes: If i did say that, please make sure to quote me. ;) No irony found there.

For you to say "its sad to see a group of people hate what their (not thier) forefathers fought so hard for" is yet another half truth and propaganda statement. You say it like you hold the truth. As if your opinion (right-leaning) is the right one. I don't think the forefathers would've ok'd warrantless wiretaps on American citizens (including groups who's only crime might've been disagreeing with the President)..

How is that a propaganda statement? How about you take a moment and listen. What if that is my OPINION? Are you attacking my OPINION? In my OPINION, i do think our forefathers would do ANYTHING to keep our country safe, secure, and free. I believe if they had wiretapping available, they would have used it. They didn't play by the rules back then, why would they now? If we used the British standard of warfare, we would have LOST the revolutionary war. We had to improvise and outsmart our enemy because they sure as hell had us out gunned. Its foolish of you to think otherwise. Read a history book! Its all there! But with your thinking, our forefathers should have stood in lines infront of the enemy guns while taking potshots at each other.

Since I'm pretty sure you'd validate the wiretap decision, I can honestly say it's hard to see someone who hates what his forefathers fought so hard for. How dare you, sir.

Hey, i'm not the one that insults our president while he is in office. I'm not the one who tries to find every little bad thing i can find and spread it around. Take a moment and think about how much more info our president has to deal with. You think you know what he knows, but you have no clue. We *MIGHT* know 1/32 of the whole truth. Now, i was against Obama being in office, but how dare YOU to imply that you KNOW what I think. I will support my president until

1.) He fails to follow the constitution.
2.) He proves that he doesn't have the will to follow through with his duties in protecting my family, myself, AND you.

So you need to stop trying to put words in my mouth that aren't there. You don't know me. And i would be more than happy to sit down with you, have a beer or two, and debate politics. Then maybe you would see that the mold you are trying to fit me into, isn't the correct one. ;)

[Shaithis]

For you to say "its sad to see a group of people hate what their (not thier) forefathers fought so hard for"

And about this, i don't play that grammar game. I know there are times people are working and mistype, or don't spellcheck all the time. Please don't play that game with me. Thank you. :cool:

[Paladin]

Sarah Palin’s daughter’s boyfriend’s mother is busted for drugs (marijuana?).

VS.

Obama’s personal drug use (marijuana/cocaine).
Obama’s sorted history with domestic terrorists.
Obama’s 20+ year membership in a racist Black Nationalist church.
Obama’s long history of consorting with anti-capitalist Marxists.
Then, of course, there are questions involving Obama’s rapid rise to power in the corrupt Illinois/Chicago machine.
And even more questions about the legitimacy of his candidacy – such as his refusal to release his ORIGINAL birth certificate.

I guess I can see why Pampers has such a fascination with Palin – he needs to deflect attention away from the tarnishing messiah. It’s going to be a very long 4 years for the Democrats.

Nice post. I doubt the Obama nuthuggers will respond to it though.

[Vertnut]

Nice post. I doubt the Obama nuthuggers will respond to it though.
There is no way for them to positively respond to that. It's...true! :D

[Paladin]

There is no way for them to positively respond to that. It's...true! :D

The truth has never stopped their hypocritical asses before, has it? :D

[Cartman]

Actually, what I've been seeing is when Obama's associations are put out in public view, there is a scream that "It doesn't matter!!!" and "Just because that person is bad, doesn't mean Obama is!" While yall may call for Palin's head because of her daughter's baby's daddy's mother (wow that's long), why don't you start screaming for Obama's head for Ayers, Wright, Farakan and the rest of the ilk? Before you can remove the splinter in our eye, might want to pay attention to the 4x4 in yours.
I am not calling for anybody's head, I was just doing what the all the nuts in here do.

so by your extremely flawed logic, or lack thereof, would you say driving with no insurance is as bad as murder?

is that a felony? :rolleyes:


My mom did the coke, that that's her fault. No one forced it on her.


good to know what your background is, and why you have no issue with drug use.

bush did coke and got a pass for it, bill did weed and got a pass, there are advantages of being the POTUS.

The funny thing about this is how I have not defended Obama in one post, but used the same tactic you all use, and I am the one wrong? If I am wrong then by me copying you all, wouldn't that also make you all wrong? :D

[Cartman]

And about this, i don't play that grammar game. I know there are times people are working and mistype, or don't spellcheck all the time. Please don't play that game with me. Thank you. :cool:
but that is all some of you all have to post up :confused:

[Blackedout01gt]

I am not calling for anybody's head, I was just doing what the all the nuts in here do.



is that a felony? :rolleyes:



good to know what your background is, and why you have no issue with drug use.

bush did coke and got a pass for it, bill did weed and got a pass, there are advantages of being the POTUS.

The funny thing about this is how I have not defended Obama in one post, but used the same tactic you all use, and I am the one wrong? If I am wrong then by me copying you all, wouldn't that also make you all wrong? :D

Come back from the twilight zone man. Maybe you need to get off of whatever YOU are smoking. :cool:

[Pro88LX]

is that a felony? :rolleyes:

its not, but i was responding to this:

would that be a double standard? both are criminals why is one crime worse then the other? :confused:


where you quoted this:

Yeah, cause being found in possession of six doobies is the same as organizing bombings, riots, and a jailbreak.



i dont see a felony reference in there do you? if you need help you quoted him in post #9.
http://dfwstangs.net/forums/showpost.php?p=5486285&postcount=9

the first time the word felony is mentioned is in post #12
http://dfwstangs.net/forums/showpost.php?p=5486312&postcount=12

[Pro88LX]

cartman, after reading all of your mind numbing posts, all i can say is please see post 44.

http://dfwstangs.net/forums/showpost.php?p=5487266&postcount=44

[blownragtop]

See, the problem with your statement is this... you say that I'm "blinded by the half truths, propaganda, and media brainwashing." However, you're dealing with half truth when you say "Obama hung out with guys that tried to hurt American citizens.", then the truth is pointed out that they didn't try to hurt anyone, and didn't...

Wrong again Pampers...


On March 6, 1970, during preparations for the bombing of an officers' dance at the Fort Dix U.S. Army base and for Butler Library at Columbia University, there was an explosion in a Greenwich Village safe house when the nail bomb being constructed prematurely detonated for unknown reasons.

Harvey Klehr, the Andrew W. Mellon professor of politics and history at Emory University in Atlanta, said in 2003, "The only reason they were not guilty of mass murder is mere incompetence. I don't know what sort of defense that is."

Please notice the emphasis on nail bomb – an antipersonel device. Their intent was to kill American soldiers.

[blownragtop]

http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h287/spridle67/obama_job_interview.gif

[Shaithis]

but that is all some of you all have to post up :confused:


I was speaking for myself, not everyone else. :rolleyes:

[Cartman]

its not, but i was responding to this:




where you quoted this:





i dont see a felony reference in there do you? if you need help you quoted him in post #9.
http://dfwstangs.net/forums/showpost.php?p=5486285&postcount=9

the first time the word felony is mentioned is in post #12
http://dfwstangs.net/forums/showpost.php?p=5486312&postcount=12

both crimes are felonies though, why is that hard for you to understand? I know I should type that out because most of you all can't think for yourself, next time I will know better.

[Magnus]

both crimes are felonies though, why is that hard for you to understand? I know I should type that out because most of you all can't think for yourself, next time I will know better.
You're a fucking idiot. Plain and simple.
You're basically telling me that someone who has a lot of weed who happens to get popped with intent to sell is the same as someone who goes on a murderous rampage killing women and children.

Logic fail.

[Vertnut]

You're a fucking idiot. Plain and simple.
You're basically telling me that someone who has a lot of weed who happens to get popped with intent to sell is the same as someone who goes on a murderous rampage killing women and children.

Logic fail.
That logic is pretty typical when dealing with the "triplets"- Zara, Gpamp, and Cartman. :rolleyes:

[Pro88LX]

both crimes are felonies though, why is that hard for you to understand? I know I should type that out because most of you all can't think for yourself, next time I will know better.

Did you realize that a felony charge can be levied for promoting the use of, or owning more than six dildos in Texas? So would you say that is no different than some of the things your messiah's friends have been associated with? If they're the same since "they're both felonies" please explain your logic to us..........

[blownragtop]

Cartman should join Pampers’ band – they’re one dildo short of a felony.

[Vertnut]

Cartman should join Pampers’ band – they’re one dildo short of a felony.
Fuckin' ZING! :p

[sc281_99-0135]

Cartman should join Pampers’ band – they’re one dildo short of a felony.

FUCKIN QUOTE OF THE DAY!!!

[forever_frost]

We're looking at this wrong. I thought the democrats said associations do not matter. So...why are you bringing this up? Doesn't this hurt your argument that we should forget Obama's associations? Not very clever if you want us to "forget" by pointing out someone who lost an election as a VP's daughter's baby's daddy's mom versus the continued shady dealings of someone who won the election as President.

Or do associations only matter when they aren't levied at your boy Obama?

Did that make sense? I'm kind of tipsy.

[Paladin]

That logic is pretty typical when dealing with the "triplets"- Zara, Gpamp, and Cartman. :rolleyes:

LOL, we can now just refer to the trips and everyone will know who it is. :D

[Cartman]

Did you realize that a felony charge can be levied for promoting the use of, or owning more than six dildos in Texas? So would you say that is no different than some of the things your messiah's friends have been associated with? If they're the same since "they're both felonies" please explain your logic to us..........
are you speaking from personal experience? There are a lot things that are felonies, and yes not all deserve the same punishment but to defend a drug dealer, is that really where you stand? I haven't defended obama, I just pointed out that you all use guilt by association, so why would palin be saved from this? :confused:

you can lump me in with whom ever you want to, it doesn't bother me. :)

[Magnus]

are you speaking from personal experience? There are a lot things that are felonies, and yes not all deserve the same punishment but to defend a drug dealer, is that really where you stand? I haven't defended obama, I just pointed out that you all use guilt by association, so why would palin be saved from this? :confused:

you can lump me in with whom ever you want to, it doesn't bother me. :)
The fact that you're a complete dumb ass in this thread should bother you.

[Cartman]

The fact that you're a complete dumb ass in this thread should bother you.
good comeback :)

[ToRqUeTwIsTeR]

YEah...right on....you trip.

[Pro88LX]

are you speaking from personal experience? There are a lot things that are felonies, and yes not all deserve the same punishment but to defend a drug dealer, is that really where you stand? I haven't defended obama, I just pointed out that you all use guilt by association, so why would palin be saved from this? :confused:

you can lump me in with whom ever you want to, it doesn't bother me. :)

you said that a felony is a felony......i was just questioning that statement. Im not defensing anyone, just trying to prove a point. Hanging out with known radicals, and your daughters boyfriends mother getting busted for drugs are 2 completely different things. if you cant see that than you really are as stupid as everyone on here says. and btw nice 3rd grade come back about the dildo felony reference :rolleyes:

[Pro88LX]

good comeback :)

i dont think that was a comeback......

[forever_frost]

We're looking at this wrong. I thought the democrats said associations do not matter. So...why are you bringing this up? Doesn't this hurt your argument that we should forget Obama's associations? Not very clever if you want us to "forget" by pointing out someone who lost an election as a VP's daughter's baby's daddy's mom versus the continued shady dealings of someone who won the election as President.

Or do associations only matter when they aren't levied at your boy Obama?

Did that make sense? I'm kind of tipsy.


Wow, I made sense. I'd like to see a comeback to this. Why is it wrong when we use Obama's affiliations against him, but it's okay to use Palin's daughter's boyfriend's mom against her?

[Taylor]

See, the problem with your statement is this... you say that I'm "blinded by the half truths, propaganda, and media brainwashing." However, you're dealing with half truth when you say "Obama hung out with guys that tried to hurt American citizens.", then the truth is pointed out that they didn't try to hurt anyone, and didn't... which you follow up with "oh, since they didn't plan on hurting anyone, that makes it ok?" You have to see the irony with you using a half truth to say that I'm blinded by them, right? Oops. I mean hypocrisy, not irony.

For you to say "its sad to see a group of people hate what their (not thier) forefathers fought so hard for" is yet another half truth and propaganda statement. You say it like you hold the truth. As if your opinion (right-leaning) is the right one. I don't think the forefathers would've ok'd warrantless wiretaps on American citizens (including groups who's only crime might've been disagreeing with the President). Since I'm pretty sure you'd validate the wiretap decision, I can honestly say it's hard to see someone who hates what his forefathers fought so hard for. How dare you, sir.

They wouldn't support it period. FWIW, Obama voted FOR wiretapping. Doing it without a warrant doesn't say as much as passing actual legislation that says hey, we can listen to your conversations now whether you like it or not. In my opinion, anyway.

PS: Where in that article does it say that Sarah Palin knows this woman comfortably? Do they hang out frequently? Are they friends? Other than her being the mom of her daughter's baby's daddy I don't even see a legit connection here.

[HOOCBB]

no I am saying both are felonies, you are saying one is a misdemeanor and one is a felony, big difference. but drugs kill people, as do bombs seems to me that they would be the same.

Different crimes carry different penalties, there are even different penalties for different felonies...

SO, this is not a double standard...a felony drug possession may carry a penalty of 10 years...while capital murder/terroristic acts would be something like 50 to life or death (depending on the jury and the state)...

[line-em-up]

Yeah, cause being found in possession of six doobies is the same as organizing bombings, riots, and a jailbreak.


It is what it is.

[Cartman]

Different crimes carry different penalties, there are even different penalties for different felonies...

SO, this is not a double standard...a felony drug possession may carry a penalty of 10 years...while capital murder/terroristic acts would be something like 50 to life or death (depending on the jury and the state)...

true but it depends on the state take georgia for example

Drug offenses make up the vast majority of felony criminal cases. If you've been arrested for a drug offense in Georgia, you can face jail or prison terms anywhere from one year to life. Fines can range up to $1000 for a misdemeanor and can be $100,000 or more for a felony.


so you can get life for drugs, if I am not mistaken there is a guy that got caught with a log(brick, or whatever it is called) of weed on a traffic stop and got 60yrs.

the fact this a parent and was selling pills, it is more of a serious offense, I hope they throw her ass in jail for the max term in her state. Of course it will be interesting to see if Palin pardons her at all.

the argument made by gpamp, was just throwing up the guilt by association. People want to say it isn't a big deal but are the same ones that used that on obama. All I did was point that out, and that both crimes are labeled as felonies. All I can say is too bad it wasn't in georgia.

[Paladin]

true but it depends on the state take georgia for example

Drug offenses make up the vast majority of felony criminal cases. If you've been arrested for a drug offense in Georgia, you can face jail or prison terms anywhere from one year to life. Fines can range up to $1000 for a misdemeanor and can be $100,000 or more for a felony.


so you can get life for drugs, if I am not mistaken there is a guy that got caught with a log(brick, or whatever it is called) of weed on a traffic stop and got 60yrs.

the fact this a parent and was selling pills, it is more of a serious offense, I hope they throw her ass in jail for the max term in her state. Of course it will be interesting to see if Palin pardons her at all.

the argument made by gpamp, was just throwing up the guilt by association. People want to say it isn't a big deal but are the same ones that used that on obama. All I did was point that out, and that both crimes are labeled as felonies. All I can say is too bad it wasn't in georgia.

So you agree with gpamp that all of Obama's associations are the same as Palin's daughters future MIL? Really?

[Fox466]

It is what it is.


Which is not the same.

[bsharer]

I guess Im out of the loop...

Is gpamp the short fat guy in the picture earlier in the thread? Band?

[sc281_99-0135]

I guess Im out of the loop...

Is gpamp the short fat guy in the picture earlier in the thread? Band?

yup

[Cartman]

So you agree with gpamp that all of Obama's associations are the same as Palin's daughters future MIL? Really?

I don't know if I would call it that, I am just saying if you want to use it one way, then it has to work the other way as well.

[gpamp]

I don't know if I would call it that, I am just saying if you want to use it one way, then it has to work the other way as well.
Right!

It's guilt by association. Everyone played that game with Obama, where if he sat in the same room with someone who did something bad when Obama was 8, then Obama must have done the same thing...? Therefore, using the right-wing media logic, then Sarah Palin, welcoming a drug dealer into her home, is like saying she's one herself. It's probably not true. But with right-wing logic... anything can be made to be the truth.

[Magnus]

Right!

It's guilt by association. Everyone played that game with Obama, where if he sat in the same room with someone who did something bad when Obama was 8, then Obama must have done the same thing...? Therefore, using the right-wing media logic, then Sarah Palin, welcoming a drug dealer into her home, is like saying she's one herself. It's probably not true. But with right-wing logic... anything can be made to be the truth.
He did much more than sit in the room with him.. . fucking idiot.

The logic of you and dumbman fail when you don't take in all the facts, only the ones you choose to like and work in your favor. . . .
Oh wait, Obama does the same thing.

[gpamp]

He did much more than sit in the room with him.. . fucking idiot.

The logic of you and dumbman fail when you don't take in all the facts, only the ones you choose to like and work in your favor. . . .
Oh wait, Obama does the same thing.
Oh man, you won that one. Dolt. Grow a brain stem and pray something blooms at the end of it.

You're right. He helped kids get an education with him. :eek2:

[Paladin]

I don't know if I would call it that, I am just saying if you want to use it one way, then it has to work the other way as well.

The jellyfish of morality doesn't know if all of Obama's personal associations are the same as Palin having a daughter who might marry a guy who's mother has problems? Why am I not surprised. You silly liberals suddenly lose your conscience when your values are put to the test, don't you? :laugh2:

[Paladin]

Oh man, you won that one. Dolt. Grow a brain stem and pray something blooms at the end of it.

You're right. He helped kids get an education with him. :eek2:

You defend Obama's association but slam Palin for a very far reaching straw grab of an association? You are a sick piece of shit for your lack of honor, decency, and complete lack of intellectual honesty my little leprechaun friend.

[Paladin]

Right!

It's guilt by association. Everyone played that game with Obama, where if he sat in the same room with someone who did something bad when Obama was 8, then Obama must have done the same thing...? Therefore, using the right-wing media logic, then Sarah Palin, welcoming a drug dealer into her home, is like saying she's one herself. It's probably not true. But with right-wing logic... anything can be made to be the truth.

Nope, you keep getting it wrong. See, you defended Obama's lifetime associations (friends, mentors, advisors, preachers, etc.) as nothing to worry about first stupid, and then claimed Palins daughters future MIL was some huge deal you hypocrite.

How convenient your loss of memory always seems to be. Hell, it is almost as bad as cartmans. lol

[gpamp]

Nope, you keep getting it wrong. See, you defended Obama's lifetime associations (friends, mentors, advisors, preachers, etc.) as nothing to worry about first stupid, and then claimed Palins daughters future MIL was some huge deal you hypocrite.

How convenient your loss of memory always seems to be. Hell, it is almost as bad as cartmans. lol
No, you ignorant phony.

What you fail to grasp is that YOU made a huge deal out of every association of Obama, whether it be that he served on a big committee that Bill Ayers happened to serve on... that was CHARITABLE, yet when I use that stupid logic you inserted into the conversation, to suggest EXACTLY WHAT YOU SUGGESTED... only about Sarah Palin and her grandaughter's other grandmother, you call me a hypocrite. Which is EXACTLY what you are, just by saying it. Nice.

[Magnus]

No, you ignorant phony.

What you fail to grasp is that YOU made a huge deal out of every association of Obama, whether it be that he served on a big committee that Bill Ayers happened to serve on... that was CHARITABLE, yet when I use that stupid logic you inserted into the conversation, to suggest EXACTLY WHAT YOU SUGGESTED... only about Sarah Palin and her grandaughter's other grandmother, you call me a hypocrite. Which is EXACTLY what you are, just by saying it. Nice.

Wow, so you're denying all the visits obama made to Ayer's house? All the backing he had in helping him begin his campaign?

You're saying that 20 years of being under a hate filled preacher doesn't count?

Typical liberal bullshit. Way to be a fucking moron, moron.

[89gt-stanger]

lol @drugs are often called victimless crimes because the victim is consenting to engage in the activity that kills them

nobody is saying anything about obama other than people bash him for who he has known and want to give palin a pass on the same thing. It isn't supporting obama, it is showing how people only choose to see what they want to see when it fits their argument.

If this story was about obama pally and crew would be all over it screaming for his head. I just called it to their attention

Your one sick bastard. I'm not even angry at all anymore at you, just disgusted. You should seriously be banned from this website. Making light of someones mothers drug use is wrong. And its nothing to joke about. My uh-oh with drugs wasnt pretty, and its nothing to joke about.

go fuck yourself.:squintfinger:

[Paladin]

No, you ignorant phony.

What you fail to grasp is that YOU made a huge deal out of every association of Obama, whether it be that he served on a big committee that Bill Ayers happened to serve on... that was CHARITABLE, yet when I use that stupid logic you inserted into the conversation, to suggest EXACTLY WHAT YOU SUGGESTED... only about Sarah Palin and her grandaughter's other grandmother, you call me a hypocrite. Which is EXACTLY what you are, just by saying it. Nice.

My argument about Obama's associations was about his poor judgment to continue to associate with these people, at his/their house, at the church, and at his offices as advisors. You then come in with the future MIL of her daughter as an example of how associations are bad but still defend Obama for all of his? You are too stupid to know you are proving your own stupidity with your argument.

No wonder you have to work at 3-4 jobs to make a living, you are too stupid to have 1 decent job.

[futant]

LMAO at the trifecto's attempt in this thread to prove a point AT ALL.
This thread is proof of how stupid the three of you are.
And we know who you are.
Only a moron would come to the defense of this arguement.

[Cartman]

LMAO at the trifecto's attempt in this thread to prove a point AT ALL.
This thread is proof of how stupid the three of you are.
And we know who you are.
Only a moron would come to the defense of this arguement.

and yet here you are defending the argument, BTW the spelling police will let you know you added the "e" when you shouldn't have.

89gt-stanger go cry in your room, I have no love for any drug user, pusher, maker etc.. I wish Texas law was as strict as Georgia's law on drugs. And the women in question was selling strong pain killers that are addictive.

Paladin you aren't even worth arguing with, you keep saying I am defending obama and yet I have not done so, what I did was take you alls argument and use it like you did. Now to say that a future MIL is not that important in terms of association, when this woman will have lasting influence on the grand child. She sells drugs, which only one step above murder. All in all you follow the Rep party blindly, which has been taking over by the religious and gun nut jobs, so hurry back to your flock little sheep and be happy to be lead to where you are told you need to be.

[White trash wagon]

Damn, this thread will NEVER go away...............

[Paladin]

and yet here you are defending the argument, BTW the spelling police will let you know you added the "e" when you shouldn't have.

89gt-stanger go cry in your room, I have no love for any drug user, pusher, maker etc.. I wish Texas law was as strict as Georgia's law on drugs. And the women in question was selling strong pain killers that are addictive.

Paladin you aren't even worth arguing with, you keep saying I am defending obama and yet I have not done so, what I did was take you alls argument and use it like you did. Now to say that a future MIL is not that important in terms of association, when this woman will have lasting influence on the grand child. She sells drugs, which only one step above murder. All in all you follow the Rep party blindly, which has been taking over by the religious and gun nut jobs, so hurry back to your flock little sheep and be happy to be lead to where you are told you need to be.

You defended the argument that Obama's lifelong (20 years at least) associations with racists, hate mongers, domestic terrorists, and people of poor character are the same as Palin having a child who's MIL was a drug addict. You are too stupid to know how stupid you are dude, seriously.

So split hairs and claim you didn't defend Obama, but you are the one who took sides with gpamp. Hell, what else do I need to say to prove your stupidity?

[Cartman]

You defended the argument that Obama's lifelong (20 years at least) associations with racists, hate mongers, domestic terrorists, and people of poor character are the same as Palin having a child who's MIL was a drug addict. You are too stupid to know how stupid you are dude, seriously.

So split hairs and claim you didn't defend Obama, but you are the one who took sides with gpamp. Hell, what else do I need to say to prove your stupidity?

well the son in law is a racist at least he admited it on his my space page before he took it down, but it is ok it is only her daughter and grandchild be effected by the racism and drugs, Palin is too busy reading those political mags she gets but can't name...lol

I havn't sided with gpamper either, unless you want to count that he pointed out the double standard you all have and how you don't like it to work against your people but it is ok for those you don't like.

find where I defended obama...lol. All I did was take the stones you threw at his glass house and threw them at palin glass house, just passing the buck.

[Paladin]

well the son in law is a racist at least he admited it on his my space page before he took it down, but it is ok it is only her daughter and grandchild be effected by the racism and drugs, Palin is too busy reading those political mags she gets but can't name...lol

I havn't sided with gpamper either, unless you want to count that he pointed out the double standard you all have and how you don't like it to work against your people but it is ok for those you don't like.

find where I defended obama...lol. All I did was take the stones you threw at his glass house and threw them at palin glass house, just passing the buck.

You have defended Obama by trying to make his numerous associations equal to Palin having her daughter marry a guy who's mother has a drug problem. Only in idiotic land does that makes sense dude.

I would have to spell poorly, write incomplete sentences, and have no common sense before I could ever write anything that you would understand.

Your argument makes no sense. If the contest was to make no sense and win, then you would win. Remember, you have sided with gpamp logic, and that pretty much puts you in no mans land for winning arguments.

Just for you I will sum up my "arguement": Obama has shown pour judgement buy associating wit numerus peeple of low character and haiteful feelings towerd this countree. (sorry, I can't keep up the stupid speak writing for you) How could anyone try and say Palin is in that category? I guess you are trying to say that if you walk into a room with a guy who was once arrested for a felony that you are no better than a guy who hangs out with murderers, rapists, and terrorists. Well, only in your idiotic land will that fly. Palin has a daughter who may marry into a family that has a drug addict in it. Obama has known and chosen to be friends with terrorists, people who hate this country, people who have been indicted and convicted of fraud (he did business with him) and people who have shown poor character. Yeah, that is the same. :Eyecrazy:

BTW, is this enough evidence of you defending Obama?