PDA

View Full Version : Everyone should just Shut up!


6t6
10-17-2008, 09:10 PM
Shut up and "spread the wealth".

Think about it. It's just not fair someone to have more than anyone else.
It's just not fair.
Everyone is entitled to have what you have. Should they not work as hard or
as much or are not as educated, that doesn't matter. You probably think
because your work more take more risks and try harder your entitled to more. You must get out of that mindset.
It's not the liberal democratic way. Whats theirs is theirs and whats
your is theirs because it's not their fault they choose to not work. It's your fault for working too much and hoping for a better life. Your not entitled to a better life because it's not really yours it's theirs. After all it's what Obama feels should be the American way.
So next time you see an Obama supporter might tell them how happy
your are that they will help give you the privilege to give your earned wages to someone who has not earned it but
who is entitled to it.
__________________

Shaithis
10-17-2008, 09:14 PM
Holy shit batman... and it begins...

bullet
10-17-2008, 09:19 PM
Shut up and "spread the wealth".

So next time you see an Obama supporter might tell them how happy
your are that they will help give you the privilege to give your earned wages to someone who has not earned it but
who is entitled to it.
__________________


I hate taxes just as much as the next guy. Just got done paying another $5800 2 days ago but I'd still rather give my tax money to someone in the U.S. who has not earned it than give it to a country in the middle east that gives zero benefit back.

6t6
10-17-2008, 09:21 PM
I hate taxes just as much as the next guy. Just got done paying another $5800 2 days ago but I'd still rather give my tax money to someone in the U.S. who has not earned it than give it to a country in the middle east that gives zero benefit back.

Just shoot me.

Denny
10-17-2008, 11:10 PM
I hate taxes just as much as the next guy. Just got done paying another $5800 2 days ago but I'd still rather give my tax money to someone in the U.S. who has not earned it than give it to a country in the middle east that gives zero benefit back.
Unbelievable... can you use that mind to tie your shoe too?

Bzilla332
10-17-2008, 11:26 PM
I hate taxes just as much as the next guy. Just got done paying another $5800 2 days ago but I'd still rather give my tax money to someone in the U.S. who has not earned it than give it to a country in the middle east that gives zero benefit back.
:rolleyes: And P.T. Barnum said...

Paladin
10-17-2008, 11:47 PM
I hate taxes just as much as the next guy. Just got done paying another $5800 2 days ago but I'd still rather give my tax money to someone in the U.S. who has not earned it than give it to a country in the middle east that gives zero benefit back.

You are more than welcome to send as much money to the IRS as you choose, just please don't ask me to send more in by voting for BHO.

mopar63
10-17-2008, 11:57 PM
Screw "Spreading the wealth".
We pay way to much in taxes as it is. I am not a Baller like a lot of folks here :D but I make a decent living and have paid 10k in taxes so far this year. Then you figure sales tax / city / school / county taxes, and Obama wants to tax us more for "Social Programs". Screw that.

lowthreeohz
10-18-2008, 12:07 AM
im single and dont make much, but pay over 15k in taxes a year. fucking gay. :mad:

thanks mr bush! lmao!

slow06
10-18-2008, 03:47 AM
I hate taxes just as much as the next guy. Just got done paying another $5800 2 days ago but I'd still rather give my tax money to someone in the U.S. who has not earned it than give it to a country in the middle east that gives zero benefit back.

Paying someone in "Insert Middle-Eastern Country here" for a product or service is very different than giving someone who refuses to get a job money that I worked very hard for. It is sad that you can't see that...

Bubbaearl
10-18-2008, 08:00 AM
you can fish or cut bait but you aint going along for the boat ride . :D

stevey_wunder
10-18-2008, 10:35 AM
I hate taxes just as much as the next guy. Just got done paying another $5800 2 days ago but I'd still rather give my tax money to someone in the U.S. who has not earned it than give it to a country in the middle east that gives zero benefit back.
Give it to me!
I'm a po niggah!

Sean88gt
10-18-2008, 10:41 AM
Without employees I wouldn't have growing wealth. I pay them what they are worth. If they want more worth they need to work for it. Giving handouts won't help the situation right now or ever for that matter.

stevey_wunder
10-18-2008, 10:53 AM
Without employees I wouldn't have growing wealth. I pay them what they are worth. If they want more worth they need to work for it. Giving handouts won't help the situation right now or ever for that matter.

Gimme yo cell phone! I know you have some good texts!!!

01WhiteCobra
10-18-2008, 11:00 AM
Without employees I wouldn't have growing wealth. I pay them what they are worth. If they want more worth they need to work for it. Giving handouts won't help the situation right now or ever for that matter.

What he said.

When we decide to add an employee the first calculation I make is what does it add to my bottom line.

I'd rather take 20% profit from revenue generated by 20 employees and not 100% profit from revenue by 1 employee.

Only so many hours in a day.

Sean88gt
10-18-2008, 11:49 AM
Gimme yo cell phone! I know you have some good texts!!!
? :confused:

Geor!
10-18-2008, 12:26 PM
im single and dont make much, but pay over 15k in taxes a year. fucking gay. :mad:

thanks mr bush! lmao!
Dubya

Denny
10-18-2008, 12:27 PM
? :confused:
Your post contained good text.

bullet
10-18-2008, 01:30 PM
Unbelievable... can you use that mind to tie your shoe too?



Did you learn ad hominem from Mccain ?



Can you not come up with a real argument against the fact that was posted ?


How many of the 911 terrorist were from Iraq ?

bullet
10-18-2008, 01:39 PM
Paying someone in "Insert Middle-Eastern Country here" for a product or service is very different than giving someone who refuses to get a job money that I worked very hard for. It is sad that you can't see that...





Spending billions on a war that was based on lies benefits you, me or the U.S. economy how ?


So you are all for tax cuts to the lower class as long as they have a job ?


Sounds good to me.

Denny
10-18-2008, 01:43 PM
Did you learn ad hominem from Mccain ?



Can you not come up with a real argument against the fact that was posted ?


How many of the 911 terrorist were from Iraq ?
Simple-minded people...

The whole reason we were attacked is because we're notorious for sitting on our hands and waiting for something to happen and then react. By then, damage is already done (ie: 9/11). If there are threats and/or potentials for threats, address it BEFORE it's too late.

Iraq posed a threat and was in violation of SEVERAL requests from weapons inspectors to go in. What would you have done better? How about I drop off some of the shit we recovered in your family's living room? If you can hinestly say you could live with that, then I'll print this page and eat my words.

You should be doing some serious ass kissing to these people out here making a difference. Since the "War on Terror" began, look at how much HASN'T been done to threaten society. Do you realize how many terroristic missions have been foiled? Do you know how bad the terroristic world has been crippled?

You don't know. You haven't seen it anywhere but CNN. Damn couch warmer. :rolleyes:

Denny
10-18-2008, 01:45 PM
Spending billions on a war that was based on lies benefits you, me or the U.S. economy how ?


So you are all for tax cuts to the lower class as long as they have a job ?


Sounds good to me.
If we pulled out right now, I give this world, as we know it literally MONTHS before you see an endless supply of willing terrorists ramping up for who knows what. I'm not for tax cuts anywhere. I'm for better management of the money coming into the government FROM BOTH PARTIES.

bullet
10-18-2008, 06:39 PM
Simple-minded people...

The whole reason we were attacked is because we're notorious for sitting on our hands and waiting for something to happen and then react. By then, damage is already done (ie: 9/11). If there are threats and/or potentials for threats, address it BEFORE it's too late.

Iraq posed a threat and was in violation of SEVERAL requests from weapons inspectors to go in. What would you have done better? How about I drop off some of the shit we recovered in your family's living room? If you can hinestly say you could live with that, then I'll print this page and eat my words.

You should be doing some serious ass kissing to these people out here making a difference. Since the "War on Terror" began, look at how much HASN'T been done to threaten society. Do you realize how many terroristic missions have been foiled? Do you know how bad the terroristic world has been crippled?

You don't know. You haven't seen it anywhere but CNN. Damn couch warmer. :rolleyes:

Ok I'll play along with your argument. If it the case then we should invade china, korea and all the other countries that have nuclear weapons all in the name of being proactive. Why don't we ?



The war on terror is worthless when you are not even fighting in the right country where any of the 911 hijackers came from.

bullet
10-18-2008, 06:46 PM
If we pulled out right now, I give this world, as we know it literally MONTHS before you see an endless supply of willing terrorists ramping up for who knows what. I'm not for tax cuts anywhere. I'm for better management of the money coming into the government FROM BOTH PARTIES.

I agree, W opened a can of worms that we are now stuck in.

So basically you are saying a republican president put us in a situation where will for many years have to spend billions of tax payer's " small business owners" money because we went in an destroyed a screwed up dicatatorship?



Speaking of simple minded, YOU WILL NEVER WIN A WAR AGAINST AN IDEALOGY. You would have to kill every extremist in order to win this war.


Iraq is just a modern day vietnam.

Denny
10-19-2008, 01:03 AM
Ok I'll play along with your argument. If it the case then we should invade china, korea and all the other countries that have nuclear weapons all in the name of being proactive. Why don't we ?



The war on terror is worthless when you are not even fighting in the right country where any of the 911 hijackers came from.
China is in full compliance and N. Korea is disarming itself. I guess you see something I don't. :confused:

The war on terror isn't just about one incident :rolleyes:

Vertnut
10-19-2008, 07:39 AM
I agree, W opened a can of worms that we are now stuck in.

So basically you are saying a republican president put us in a situation where will for many years have to spend billions of tax payer's " small business owners" money because we went in an destroyed a screwed up dicatatorship?



Speaking of simple minded, YOU WILL NEVER WIN A WAR AGAINST AN IDEALOGY. You would have to kill every extremist in order to win this war.


Iraq is just a modern day vietnam.
So do you suggest we just roll over and let them bomb us here at home? I don't get your point. You are correct about this being a war about ideology, but how do you suggest we fight it? Stick our head in the sand like Clinton did? Does a cancer patient ignore a growing tumor forever? No. They fight it every way they can, for the rest of their lives. This "war" is about the same scenario for this country.

bullet
10-19-2008, 10:41 AM
China is in full compliance and N. Korea is disarming itself. I guess you see something I don't. :confused:

The war on terror isn't just about one incident :rolleyes:



Compliance is a little easier when one country is told they can't have a program and one is allowed to have one.




How many nuclear weapons did we find in Iraq ?




According to the same UN that you say China is complying with now , they also said there was nothing new found in iraq after we invaded.






NK also said they would dismantle their reactors in 2006 and just a few months ago they stopped complying and said this




In a statement carried by the Korea Central News Agency, the ministry said the US was insisting on extra inspections that would infringe upon its sovereignty.

"The US is gravely mistaken if it thinks it can make a house search in DPRK as it pleases just as it did in Iraq," said the statement, using the acronym for the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. "We have decided to immediately suspend disabling our nuclear facilities."



Now they say they will do it again this month. I'm not holding my breath.

bullet
10-19-2008, 10:48 AM
So do you suggest we just roll over and let them bomb us here at home? I don't get your point. You are correct about this being a war about ideology, but how do you suggest we fight it? Stick our head in the sand like Clinton did? Does a cancer patient ignore a growing tumor forever? No. They fight it every way they can, for the rest of their lives. This "war" is about the same scenario for this country.



You can not win the fight against an idealogy. The more we butt in, the more hate they have for the west and the more the reason to attack us in the future. It is just like a cancer that feeds and keeps growing and growing.
The war on terror and a war against a man who tried to kill Bush's father so I need to get revenge is not the same thing. I ask again how many of the 911 attackers were from Iraq ? Why are we not attacking where they were from on this war on terror ?

mysticcobrakilla
10-19-2008, 11:01 AM
Ok I'll play along with your argument. If it the case then we should invade china, korea and all the other countries that have nuclear weapons all in the name of being proactive. Why don't we ?



The war on terror is worthless when you are not even fighting in the right country where any of the 911 hijackers came from.
please grab a history book and read it! or better yet look up "containment" on google or wikipedia.