BCS top two still the same!

[Pro Trash]

1. Ohio State
2. Michigan
3. USC
4. Florida
5. Notre Dame
6. Arkansas
7. West Virginia
8. Wisconsin
9. Louisville
10. LSU
11. Boise State
12. Auburn
13. Texas
14. Rutgers
15. Oklahoma
16. Georgia Tech
17. Virginia Tech
18. Boston College
19. California
20. Tennessee
21. Wake Forest
22. Nebraska
23. Brigham Young
24. Clemson
25. Penn State

[Trip McNeely]

Good.

[davidaustin]

not a fan of the rematch personally.

i dont think its good for the game... a rematch in consecutive games basically proves that what you did on the field doesnt matter for the NC game.

[Pro Trash]

not a fan of the rematch personally.

i dont think its good for the game... a rematch in consecutive games basically proves that what you did on the field doesnt matter for the NC game.


You didn't think a rematch for the NC was a bad idea when suggested in the Auburn vs. Georgia thread around 11/11 when UT only had one loss and someone stated UT might back into the NC ;)

A 1-loss team getting to the NC wouldnt be backing into anything?? Its pretty much guaranteed there will be a 1-loss team at this point.
Texas has also been the highest human ranked 1-loss team the entire year.

[ZYouL8R]

You didn't think a rematch for the NC was a bad idea when suggested in the Auburn vs. Georgia thread around 11/11 when UT only had one loss and someone stated UT might back into the NC ;)

I'm pretty sure he said consecutive games.

[Pro Trash]

I'm pretty sure he said consecutive games.

He knows I am just messing with him, he is one of the easiest going UT fans on the board. I'm not sure why you felt the need to defend David though, he is very capable and sharp when it comes to college games, unlike yourself ;) .

[That_Is_My_El_Camino]

From now on, each time that I'm wrong (and it won't be often), I'm going to follow it up with "Yeah, well, he knows I'm just joking," and hope I don't sound as dumme as Pro Trash.

[davidaustin]

He knows I am just messing with him, he is one of the easiest going UT fans on the board. I'm not sure why you felt the need to defend David though, he is very capable and sharp when it comes to college games, unlike yourself ;) .



LOL... :o

its really just the consecutive thing that is bothering me.

it just doesnt seem fair to the kids at OSU to have to 'prove' they are #1 by playing the same team again in back to back games.

i think an early loss to a team and then playing again is acceptable. in Texas' case there would have been 10 weeks or respective football between matchups. alot changes over the course of the year and with a few lucky breaks with the computers and other factors like teams losing sometimes rematches happen based on being the best of the rest. i also think the Texas matchup posed an interesting story line in that they are essentially 1-1. a NC rematch could have been seen as a tiebreaker to one of the best nonconf matchups in a LONG time. this isnt just a Texas thing either. if Michigan has played OSU back in september and finished out strong i would most likely feel completely ok with the decision. seeing a team in action for a few weeks after a loss tells much more about a team than the day they took a L. most teams have to continue to prove they are #2 after taking a loss. Michigan seems to have avoided that hurdle this year.

it is what it is though... i do think that when its all said and done that USC will take the #2 spot... which is quite impressive after losing the talent they had last year.

[Cartman]

in my best svtvenom rant

fuck the bcs arkansas is the best one loss team this is total bullshit. it is espn just saying that mich deserves to be there.


but in all honesty I think it should be either UF or ARK winner or ND/USC winner to get a shot at TOSU. mich had their chance and fucked it off.

[ZYouL8R]

He knows I am just messing with him, he is one of the easiest going UT fans on the board. I'm not sure why you felt the need to defend David though, he is very capable and sharp when it comes to college games, unlike yourself ;) .

True, I got nothing.

[Denny]

in my best svtvenom rant

fuck the bcs arkansas is the best one loss team this is total bullshit. it is espn just saying that mich deserves to be there.


but in all honesty I think it should be either UF or ARK winner or ND/USC winner to get a shot at TOSU. mich had their chance and fucked it off.

Ya, If Arkansas and Florida win their next game and play, then the best winner from that or the USC/ND game should go in. The loser of the USC/ND will go to the Rose Bowl to face Mich. And if the loser of the Florida/Ark game goes to the Capital One Bowl. The most dominant winner of the two games goes to NC. The less dominant loser the Sugar Bowl.

Any problems with that?!?!

[ALLAN]

Gay.
fixed

[Cartman]

Ya, If Arkansas and Florida win their next game and play, then the best winner from that or the USC/ND game should go in. The loser of the USC/ND will go to the Rose Bowl to face Mich. And if the loser of the Florida/Ark game goes to the Capital One Bowl. The most dominant winner of the two games goes to NC. The less dominant loser the Sugar Bowl.

Any problems with that?!?!
if you mean if one teams looks more dominant like ark wins by 20 pts and nd wins by say 7 than ark should go, or vise versa on scores nd should go, then yea that would be the best case for it to work the way they wanted it to.

[Denny]

if you mean if one teams looks more dominant like ark wins by 20 pts and nd wins by say 7 than ark should go, or vise versa on scores nd should go, then yea that would be the best case for it to work the way they wanted it to.
Yep

[Cartman]

Yep
well in that case may the best team win big :D

[Denny]

well in that case may the best team win big :D
Not like they'll follow that logic anyway. ;)

[bert89coupe]

the only problem with ark. or nd jumping usc and michigan to go to the nc game would be this. People or voters are going to say, but Arkansas lost to USC in the first game by 30 something points so they shouldn't jump over USC if USC doesn't lose again. Then the others will say but ND shouldn't go if they win out cause they got their ass handed to them by Michigan early in the year. It would be the same way if Texas still only had 1 loss and OSU had lost that game, no way UT would've jumped them.

anybody get what i'm saying?


I have no problem with Michigan going to the NC game, whatever keeps ND and USC out of it is fine by me :D I'd rather see Florida in it too, but not Arkansas.

[Pro Trash]

I'd like to see an OSU vs. USC game :D

[Pro Trash]

From now on, each time that I'm wrong (and it won't be often), I'm going to follow it up with "Yeah, well, he knows I'm just joking," and hope I don't sound as dumme as Pro Trash.

At least I know how to spell dumb ;)

[Cartman]

the only problem with ark. or nd jumping usc and michigan to go to the nc game would be this. People or voters are going to say, but Arkansas lost to USC in the first game by 30 something points so they shouldn't jump over USC if USC doesn't lose again. Then the others will say but ND shouldn't go if they win out cause they got their ass handed to them by Michigan early in the year. It would be the same way if Texas still only had 1 loss and OSU had lost that game, no way UT would've jumped them.

anybody get what i'm saying?


I have no problem with Michigan going to the NC game, whatever keeps ND and USC out of it is fine by me :D I'd rather see Florida in it too, but not Arkansas.
why is that, you don't want osu to lose? :D

[Denny]

the only problem with ark. or nd jumping usc and michigan to go to the nc game would be this. People or voters are going to say, but Arkansas lost to USC in the first game by 30 something points so they shouldn't jump over USC if USC doesn't lose again. Then the others will say but ND shouldn't go if they win out cause they got their ass handed to them by Michigan early in the year. It would be the same way if Texas still only had 1 loss and OSU had lost that game, no way UT would've jumped them.

anybody get what i'm saying?


I have no problem with Michigan going to the NC game, whatever keeps ND and USC out of it is fine by me :D I'd rather see Florida in it too, but not Arkansas.
Boise St. FTW!!!!!!!!!!

[bert89coupe]

why is that, you don't want osu to lose? :D



something like that

[Cartman]

something like that
hater

[Cartman]

Not like they'll follow that logic anyway. ;)
well my boys let me down, so lets see if your boys can pull it off :(

[Cartman]

Not like they'll follow that logic anyway. ;)
I guess we both jinxed our teams well now I want to see a rematch of mich and osu

[momo stallion]

I guess we both jinxed our teams well now I want to see a rematch of mich and osu


i would love to see Michigan but highley doubt that's gonna happen. it has to be USC now.

fuck, i wont even know who to cheer against in this one... i hate tOSU and USC.

[exlude]

I'll probably be pulling for OSU in an OSU v. USC game.

[ZYouL8R]

I'll probably be pulling for OSU in an OSU v. USC game.

I hope they somehow tie.

[bert89coupe]

hater



i learned from you :D

[Cartman]

i learned from you :D
but i wanted to see texas play usc so I could watch them get beat, but I was wrong and ut won.

[Denny]

i would love to see Michigan but highley doubt that's gonna happen. it has to be USC now.

fuck, i wont even know who to cheer against in this one... i hate tOSU and USC.
Fuck that, Buckeyes all the way! I fucking HATE the Trojans!