PDA

View Full Version : 1st BCS rankings were just released


SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 02:37 PM
And they are allll sorts of fucked up.

http://www.bcsfootball.org/cfb/story/6065310

1. Ohio State
2. USC
3. Michigan
4. Auburn
5. West Virginia
6. Florida
7. Louisville
8. Notre Dame
9. Texas
10. Cal

Grant
10-15-2006, 02:40 PM
How are they fucked up?

That_Is_My_El_Camino
10-15-2006, 02:41 PM
Texas isn't in the top 5. :D

01WhiteCobra
10-15-2006, 02:43 PM
Lmao

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 02:43 PM
How are they fucked up?

Auburn got blown out by unranked team, Notre Dame got blown out by Michigan and hasn't played anyone of worth since then, Lousiville and West Virginia haven't played anyone, and Texas has only lost 1 game and that was to the #1 team in the nation.

jefehbk
10-15-2006, 02:43 PM
And they are allll sorts of fucked up.

http://www.bcsfootball.org/cfb/story/6065310

1. Ohio State
2. USC
3. Michigan
4. Auburn
5. West Virginia
6. Florida
7. Louisville
8. Notre Dame
9. Texas
10. Cal


I dont agree with USC being #2 or Auburn #4. I think Texas and Florida should be a bit higher

def1eppard
10-15-2006, 02:44 PM
You didn't mention the biggest fuck up. Why the hell is Michigan not number 2?

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 02:45 PM
You didn't mention the biggest fuck up. Why the hell is Michigan not number 2?

That too.

Also, Cal got blown out by Tennessee. If anything, that should be Tennessee's spot.

That_Is_My_El_Camino
10-15-2006, 02:51 PM
Auburn got blown out by unranked team, Notre Dame got blown out by Michigan and hasn't played anyone of worth since then, Lousiville and West Virginia haven't played anyone, and Texas has only lost 1 game and that was to the #1 team in the nation.Texas didn't put up much more of a fight against Ohio State than Notre Dame did against Michigan, and Texas hasn't played "anyone of worth" since that game, either. I'm just sayin'...

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 03:00 PM
Texas didn't put up much more of a fight against Ohio State than Notre Dame did against Michigan, and Texas hasn't played "anyone of worth" since that game, either. I'm just sayin'...

Not much of a fight?

I don't call 340 offensive yards against the #1 team in the nation not much of a fight.

Notre Dame got beat by 26. Thats not much of a fight.

Texas has beaten 3 Big XII teams already including Oklahoma.

That_Is_My_El_Camino
10-15-2006, 03:05 PM
I'd call 7 points on the scoreboard, versus 24, not much of a fight. A little, but not much.

Wowzers. Texas beat Oklahoma (not bad, but not entirely great), Baylor (LOLzorz!!!), and Iowa State.

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 03:20 PM
I'd call 7 points on the scoreboard, versus 24, not much of a fight. A little, but not much.

Wowzers. Texas beat Oklahoma (not bad, but not entirely great), Baylor (LOLzorz!!!), and Iowa State.

That 7 easily could have been 17 if not for a fumble on the goal-line and a bad kick. That score was somewhat deceptive.

Just to prove a point on how FUCKED UP the BCS Computers are, here are the top 10 COMPUTER rankings:

1. USC
2. Michigan
3. Ohio State
4. Florida
5. Auburn
6. California
7. Notre Dame
8. Arkansas
9. Rutgers
10. Louisville

Looks like someone needs to install Norton on those computers because they are messed up.

Nate
10-15-2006, 03:22 PM
Auburn got blown out by unranked team, Notre Dame got blown out by Michigan and hasn't played anyone of worth since then, Lousiville and West Virginia haven't played anyone, and Texas has only lost 1 game and that was to the #1 team in the nation.
ND got beat by the 2nd best team in the nation and have actually played better opponents than UT.

Badass2000gt
10-15-2006, 03:25 PM
ND got beat by the 2nd best team in the nation and have actually played better opponents than UT.
but almost lost to Michigan st a unranked team.

That_Is_My_El_Camino
10-15-2006, 03:26 PM
I would sure like to see Texas sitting up near the top, but I don't think they're that good. Colt McCoy has a looooong way to go.

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 03:26 PM
ND got beat by the 2nd best team in the nation and have actually played better opponents than UT.

Ha, they barely beat Georgia Tech, beat now unranked Penn State, barely beat unranked Michigan St by 3, and unranked Purdue and Stanford.

Definately not better opponents than Texas has played and Texas' margin of winning is much higher.

Nate
10-15-2006, 03:30 PM
Ha, they barely beat Georgia Tech, beat now unranked Penn State, barely beat unranked Michigan St by 3, and unranked Purdue and Stanford.

Definately not better opponents than Texas has played and Texas' margin of winning is much higher.
Wins are wins still.

Badass2000gt
10-15-2006, 03:32 PM
Wins are wins still.
I dont think so. Why did OU fall down in the rankings when they beat UAB?

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 03:32 PM
Wins are wins still.

I agree for the most part, but meeting/beating spreads/expectations is important to voters. Texas is 6-1 with their only loss to #1 Ohio State. Notre Dame is 5-1 with their only loss to #3 Michigan. Texas was beaten by the better opponent, lost by less points, and is ranked higher in all 3 polls.

Cartman
10-15-2006, 03:40 PM
That 7 easily could have been 17 if not for a fumble on the goal-line and a bad kick. That score was somewhat deceptive.

Just to prove a point on how FUCKED UP the BCS Computers are, here are the top 10 COMPUTER rankings:

1. USC
2. Michigan
3. Ohio State
4. Florida
5. Auburn
6. California
7. Notre Dame
8. Arkansas
9. Rutgers
10. Louisville

Looks like someone needs to install Norton on those computers because they are messed up.
that looks right to me arkansas has more wins over top 25 teams than texas so they should be higher. and their lose is to number1 or 2 depending on which poll so this is how it should be. :D

don't cry because you know what you need more than anything for texas to have any shot at a title game is for arkansas to win out to keep auburn out of the sec title game, and you need UA to beat UF for texas to have a shot. but I know mitch isn't ready yet for this and they will lose at least 2 more games b4 the end of the season. so you better hope I am wrong and start rooting for the pigs. :D :cool:

Cartman
10-15-2006, 03:42 PM
Ha, they barely beat Georgia Tech, beat now unranked Penn State, barely beat unranked Michigan St by 3, and unranked Purdue and Stanford.

Definately not better opponents than Texas has played and Texas' margin of winning is much higher.
all those teams are way better than anybody texas has played other than OSU.

Cartman
10-15-2006, 03:43 PM
Auburn got blown out by unranked team, Notre Dame got blown out by Michigan and hasn't played anyone of worth since then, Lousiville and West Virginia haven't played anyone, and Texas has only lost 1 game and that was to the #1 team in the nation.
remember when arkansas beat then number 5 texas at texas and texas didn't lose much spots then why would you expect auburn to be affected any different now?

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 03:44 PM
that looks right to me arkansas has more wins over top 25 teams than texas so they should be higher. and their lose is to number1 or 2 depending on which poll so this is how it should be. :D

don't cry because you know what you need more than anything for texas to have any shot at a title game is for arkansas to win out to keep auburn out of the sec title game, and you need UA to beat UF for texas to have a shot. but I know mitch isn't ready yet for this and they will lose at least 2 more games b4 the end of the season. so you better hope I am wrong and start rooting for the pigs. :D :cool:

Arkansas lucked out against Vandy/'Bama and caught Auburn on an off day. They still have to play Tennessee and LSU. They'll lose those games.

Also, 'Bama was only ranked in 1 poll when Arkisaw beat them in OT and they were like #24 anyway.

Cartman
10-15-2006, 03:47 PM
Arkansas lucked out against Vandy/'Bama and caught Auburn on an off day. They still have to play Tennessee and LSU. They'll lose those games.

Also, 'Bama was only ranked in 1 poll when Arkisaw beat them in OT and they were like #24 anyway.
that doesn't matter, as you have stated many many times. they still have beaten more ranked foes than texas. and they play a 10x harder schedule than texas. if the hogs some how win out you are gonna cry when they leap frog the horns. :D

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 03:47 PM
all those teams are way better than anybody texas has played other than OSU.

No way. This isn't last year where Penn State was good and Purdue sucks. Stanford? They haven't been good since before I was born.

Notre Dame always plays a bunch of nobodies to rack up wins and puts USC on there at the end of the year. NBC has the TV contract with them so you know the BCS is going to be slobbing that knob.

Cartman
10-15-2006, 03:49 PM
No way. This isn't last year where Penn State was good and Purdue sucks. Stanford? They haven't been good since before I was born.

Notre Dame always plays a bunch of nobodies to rack up wins and puts USC on there at the end of the year. NBC has the TV contract with them so you know the BCS is going to be slobbing that knob.
penn st would roll up the bears or the other big 12 team that texas has played, the ou game would be a good one, but with out AD Penn would win.

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 03:51 PM
that doesn't matter, as you have stated many many times. they still have beaten more ranked foes than texas. and they play a 10x harder schedule than texas. if the hogs some how win out you are gonna cry when they leap frog the horns. :D

The 'Bama game doesn't really count as a ranked team win because they were in only one poll. Thats more like .5 of a ranked win and it wasn't much of one at that.

You know they won't win out and they won't leapfrog anyone, let alone Texas.

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 03:53 PM
penn st would roll up the bears or the other big 12 team that texas has played, the ou game would be a good one, but with out AD Penn would win.

Maybe last year, but not this year. They aren't anywhere near what they were last year. Morrelli can't throw for shit. Surprisingly, Baylor is alot better than they have been in many years. Iowa State has a pretty decent offense, but their defense is poor.

Cartman
10-15-2006, 03:54 PM
The 'Bama game doesn't really count as a ranked team win because they were in only one poll. Thats more like .5 of a ranked win and it wasn't much of one at that.

You know they won't win out and they won't leapfrog anyone, let alone Texas.

it doesn't matter, like you stated so many times in the past were they ranked when they played, yes did they beat them yes. that is all thank you.

you like to use things that only help texas look good, but when somebody else uses it you try and turn it around again. but that doesn't work with me. you will have to pick one way you want all teams to be judge and go from there, otherwise I will be here to pounce on you every time you slip up. :D

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 03:56 PM
it doesn't matter, like you stated so many times in the past were they ranked when they played, yes did they beat them yes. that is all thank you.

you like to use things that only help texas look good, but when somebody else uses it you try and turn it around again. but that doesn't work with me. you will have to pick one way you want all teams to be judge and go from there, otherwise I will be here to pounce on you every time you slip up. :D

Either way, they were only in 1 poll and are no longer ranked.

Cartman
10-15-2006, 03:57 PM
Either way, they were only in 1 poll and are no longer ranked.
but you better hope auburn and flordia both lose a game somewhere down the road or texas will never see the championship game.

The Big Matt
10-15-2006, 03:57 PM
what about A&M hitting the polls.. whoooop

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 04:26 PM
what about A&M hitting the polls.. whoooop

That will be short lived.

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 04:28 PM
but you better hope auburn and flordia both lose a game somewhere down the road or texas will never see the championship game.

Texas will move up more spots in the coming weeks. I'm just pissed because of how out of whack the computers are and not just with Texas either.

Cartman
10-15-2006, 04:30 PM
Texas will move up more spots in the coming weeks. I'm just pissed because of how out of whack the computers are and not just with Texas either.
texas can't move up with out those teams losing, they still have ranked teams to play and texas has a&m, which is one loss from not being ranked by the time texas plays them.

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 04:33 PM
texas can't move up with out those teams losing, they still have ranked teams to play and texas has a&m, which is one loss from not being ranked by the time texas plays them.

Texas has to play a good ranked team in Nebraska next week and depending on how they play in that game, they'll move up.

The teams ahead of Texas have too many tough games ahead for them to all stay in front.

Cartman
10-15-2006, 04:36 PM
Texas has to play a good ranked team in Nebraska next week and depending on how they play in that game, they'll move up.

The teams ahead of Texas have too many tough games ahead for them to all stay in front.
keep that hope alive, and yea I forgot about neb. but I think they will not be ranked by the end of the season, they are more overranked than arkansas.

Nate
10-15-2006, 04:37 PM
Texas will move up more spots in the coming weeks. I'm just pissed because of how out of whack the computers are and not just with Texas either.
It's funny you are pissed about a poll that doesn't fucking matter. Polls until the last week of the season don't mean shit.

Hell this stuff doesn't mean shit in real life, it's fucking college football.

That_Is_My_El_Camino
10-15-2006, 04:39 PM
IRL, Nassty Nate pwns all. SIKE!!!

Cartman
10-15-2006, 04:52 PM
It's funny you are pissed about a poll that doesn't fucking matter. Polls until the last week of the season don't mean shit.

Hell this stuff doesn't mean shit in real life, it's fucking college football.
he should have known that when the computers said ark is 15th...lol I am a huge fan and know they aren't that good this year, next maybe but not this year.

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 04:56 PM
he should have known that when the computers said ark is 15th...lol I am a huge fan and know they aren't that good this year, next maybe but not this year.

No, if they are this fucked up this early in the season, I can only imagine what they might be at the end if Texas wins out.

Cartman
10-15-2006, 04:59 PM
No, if they are this fucked up this early in the season, I can only imagine what they might be at the end if Texas wins out.
in the same place if all the above teams minus 2 win out. :p

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 05:02 PM
in the same place if all the above teams minus 2 win out. :p

I hope not or else Texas might become the 2004 Auburn Tigers and get screwed out of the BCS yet again.

Cartman
10-15-2006, 05:04 PM
I hope not or else Texas might become the 2004 Auburn Tigers and get screwed out of the BCS yet again.
LMMFAO...that has to be the best thing ever posted. texas lost a game. Auburn didn't, texas plays in a weak conference auburn didn't. comparing those two teams is like comparing ark and texas last year. :D :D :D

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 05:06 PM
LMMFAO...that has to be the best thing ever posted. texas lost a game. Auburn didn't, texas plays in a weak conference auburn didn't. comparing those two teams is like comparing ark and texas last year. :D :D :D

I'm merely saying that Texas gets screwed every year in the BCS unless they go undefeated and its total BS.

We'll see what happens, but I hope these computers get some better formulas to work with or you are going to see tons of college football fans burning the BCS headquarters down.

Cartman
10-15-2006, 05:10 PM
I'm merely saying that Texas gets screwed every year in the BCS unless they go undefeated and its total BS.

We'll see what happens, but I hope these computers get some better formulas to work with or you are going to see tons of college football fans burning the BCS headquarters down.
don't worry mack brown will start crying sometime in the next 3 weeks about how he gets no respect then all of a sudden the polls will change and texas will be ranked number 1 because they won it last year, and should get to defend the title.

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 05:12 PM
don't worry mack brown will start crying sometime in the next 3 weeks about how he gets no respect then all of a sudden the polls will change and texas will be ranked number 1 because they won it last year, and should get to defend the title.

Yeah, you cry about Mack talking to the press yet you don't say anything about Tubberville talking only last week. The voters vote the way they do no matter what is said.

Cartman
10-15-2006, 05:30 PM
Yeah, you cry about Mack talking to the press yet you don't say anything about Tubberville talking only last week. The voters vote the way they do no matter what is said.
really did tubberville cry about unfair rankings? I didn't hear about it. but we all know mack cried all over sportscenter about how it is unfair that they are left out of the bcs games then all of a sudden they jumped over cal. funny how that works out. when tubberville stated I don't understand how you can go undefeated in teh SEC and not get a shot at the title, which is a valid point. but he didn't cry he just went out and played their bowl game.

DON SVO
10-15-2006, 05:32 PM
will you two get a room and pity fuck each other already?

Cartman
10-15-2006, 05:33 PM
will you two get a room and pity fuck each other already?
I am sorry can you look up when you are talking to me wee man.

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 05:34 PM
really did tubberville cry about unfair rankings? I didn't hear about it. but we all know mack cried all over sportscenter about how it is unfair that they are left out of the bcs games then all of a sudden they jumped over cal. funny how that works out. when tubberville stated I don't understand how you can go undefeated in teh SEC and not get a shot at the title, which is a valid point. but he didn't cry he just went out and played their bowl game.

He not only cried about that when Auburn went undefeated, but he said after Arkansas beat them that the BCS shouldn't be in place and it should be a playoff style system.

Cartman
10-15-2006, 05:37 PM
He not only cried about that when Auburn went undefeated, but he said after Arkansas beat them that the BCS shouldn't be in place and it should be a playoff style system.
he has asked for the playoff's for the last 4 yrs, next. and he didn't cry he said he can't understand how it is possible but he will get his team ready for the bowl game. that was the end of it. he wasn't doing interview after interview with sports center and other media crying about how texas is getting treated unfairly. you could almost see his tears when asking why he can't get into the bcs game

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 05:39 PM
he has asked for the playoff's for the last 4 yrs, next. and he didn't cry he said he can't understand how it is possible but he will get his team ready for the bowl game. that was the end of it. he wasn't doing interview after interview with sports center and other media crying about how texas is getting treated unfairly. you could almost see his tears when asking why he can't get into the bcs game

Hahaha, you acuse me of defending Mack and you are doing the same with Tuberville. Face it, both teams deserved to get there, but Texas played better non-conference teams during their championship year.

unkoricky
10-15-2006, 05:41 PM
will you two get a room and pity fuck each other already?
hahahaha ...word

Cartman
10-15-2006, 05:55 PM
hahahaha ...word
hey I gotta do something to take my mind off the woeful dolphins, daunte still isn't playing, and don't know when he will again. this is a lost season. I hope there are some good players in this draft.

Boss Hogg
10-15-2006, 05:55 PM
It's too early to matter but it's interesting how the computers calculate Rutgers as the 9th best team in the nation based off of this difficult schedule.

at North Carolina W 21-16
Illinois W 33-0
Ohio W 24-7
Howard W 56-7
at South Florida W 22-20
at Navy W 34-0

Cartman
10-15-2006, 05:56 PM
It's too early to matter but it's interesting how the computers calculate Rutgers as the 9th best team in the nation based off of this difficult schedule.

at North Carolina W 21-16
Illinois W 33-0
Ohio W 24-7
Howard W 56-7
at South Florida W 22-20
at Navy W 34-0

I didn't say anything about that, becasue I honestly don't know shit about them this year or any year in the past. :o

davidaustin
10-15-2006, 06:08 PM
I don't see week 1's rankings as any bid deal considering that the the 4th-11th teams are separtated by .1

Still alot of ball to be played.

01WhiteCobra
10-15-2006, 06:22 PM
I have to say I was wrong... Hook 'Em wasn't the biggest UT homer ever.

Nate
10-15-2006, 06:41 PM
I have to say I was wrong... Hook 'Em wasn't the biggest UT homer ever.
Hookem made me laugh when UT lost...now just because of SVTVenom I wish for UT to lose every game including against OU. I really did root for UT before having to see his homerism worst than Maston and Hook'em combined. Hell you can even throw Protrash in there and it will still fall short.

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 06:48 PM
Hookem made me laugh when UT lost...now just because of SVTVenom I wish for UT to lose every game including against OU. I really did root for UT before having to see his homerism worst than Maston and Hook'em combined. Hell you can even throw Protrash in there and it will still fall short.

You just can't stand the fact that I can back my reasoning up with fact while the rest are nothing but pointless, mindless banter.

davidaustin
10-15-2006, 06:50 PM
laughable

Nate
10-15-2006, 06:55 PM
You just can't stand the fact that I can back my reasoning up with fact while the rest are nothing but pointless, mindless banter.
LOL...your "facts" are laughable at best. Protrash displays better logic and facts than your blatant nuthuggery. The only way you would realize that UT wasn't the greatest would be if VY came to your house and told you.

That_Is_My_El_Camino
10-15-2006, 07:16 PM
The only way you would realize that UT wasn't the greatest would be if VY came to your house and told you.Nice! :D

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 07:21 PM
LOL...your "facts" are laughable at best. Protrash displays better logic and facts than your blatant nuthuggery. The only way you would realize that UT wasn't the greatest would be if VY came to your house and told you.

LMFAO. PT thinks A&M is just as good as Texas because both have one loss.

0SVT3
10-15-2006, 08:29 PM
Auburn got blown out by unranked team, Notre Dame got blown out by Michigan and hasn't played anyone of worth since then, Lousiville and West Virginia haven't played anyone, and Texas has only lost 1 game and that was to the #1 team in the nation.


I AGREE BCS SUCKS :mad:

Pro Trash
10-15-2006, 08:52 PM
LMFAO. PT thinks A&M is just as good as Texas because both have one loss.

No I think we have a chance at beating UT due to the in-state rivalry factor kind of like OSU and OU. I called it on UT this week again in the college pickem's I put UT up as the top scorer and guess what they did. I think Texas A&M is having a great season so far due to a weak schedule but has the ability to self destruct in a game still. I understand Texas A&M is not the best program in Texas.

You are the idiot that speaks of UT as if it is the best program in the Nation. Why else would you have started this stupid ass thread?

Ohio State came into UT's home and ran UT over which basically proved to you that UT truly was no longer number 1. Let's imagine every team takes a loss and somehow UT ends up in the National Championship against say Ohio State or Michigan, do you really think they would win? I admit they are good but there are several programs that are better. I think that Auburn, Florida, USC and WVA are equal or stronger programs than UT currently. I also think that Michigan and Ohio State are stronger than UT.

SVTVenom
10-15-2006, 09:12 PM
No I think we have a chance at beating UT due to the in-state rivalry factor kind of like OSU and OU. I called it on UT this week again in the college pickem's I put UT up as the top scorer and guess what they did. I think Texas A&M is having a great season so far due to a weak schedule but has the ability to self destruct in a game still. I understand Texas A&M is not the best program in Texas.

You are the idiot that speaks of UT as if it is the best program in the Nation. Why else would you have started this stupid ass thread?

Ohio State came into UT's home and ran UT over which basically proved to you that UT truly was no longer number 1. Let's imagine every team takes a loss and somehow UT ends up in the National Championship against say Ohio State or Michigan, do you really think they would win? I admit they are good but there are several programs that are better. I think that Auburn, Florida, USC and WVA are equal or stronger programs than UT currently. I also think that Michigan and Ohio State are stronger than UT.

Yeah, A&M had a chance at beating Texas for the past 6 years and we all know how thats gone.

If Texas does get into the BCS Championship game against whoever, I think they have just as good, if not better, chance of beating whoever is on the opposing team.

TRAXX
10-15-2006, 09:55 PM
Wow, anyone that looks at those computer rankings and thinks they look right should be shot. I would like to see the reasoning behind those numbers (when im not tired and about to go to bed)

There is still plenty off football to be played though, so we shall see how things shake out.

Cartman
10-19-2006, 10:14 AM
Auburn got blown out by unranked team, Notre Dame got blown out by Michigan and hasn't played anyone of worth since then, Lousiville and West Virginia haven't played anyone, and Texas has only lost 1 game and that was to the #1 team in the nation.
I thought about why auburn is ranked higher, so what they lost to unranked arkansas, they still beat the number 2, number 6 or 9 can't remember what lsu was ranked when they played. texas beat what number 16 ou wow. they have better wins which is more important than better losses, at least to the computers.

LannyN9NE
10-19-2006, 04:00 PM
Not much of a fight?

I don't call 340 offensive yards against the #1 team in the nation not much of a fight.

Notre Dame got beat by 26. Thats not much of a fight.

Texas has beaten 3 Big XII teams already including Oklahoma.

Yards do not equal touchdowns, remember?

bert89coupe
10-19-2006, 04:38 PM
No I think we have a chance at beating UT due to the in-state rivalry factor kind of like OSU and OU. I called it on UT this week again in the college pickem's I put UT up as the top scorer and guess what they did. I think Texas A&M is having a great season so far due to a weak schedule but has the ability to self destruct in a game still. I understand Texas A&M is not the best program in Texas.

You are the idiot that speaks of UT as if it is the best program in the Nation. Why else would you have started this stupid ass thread?

Ohio State came into UT's home and ran UT over which basically proved to you that UT truly was no longer number 1. Let's imagine every team takes a loss and somehow UT ends up in the National Championship against say Ohio State or Michigan, do you really think they would win? I admit they are good but there are several programs that are better. I think that Auburn, Florida, USC and WVA are equal or stronger programs than UT currently. I also think that Michigan and Ohio State are stronger than UT.



Please don't compare UT's second game of the season with it's Freshmen QB starting his SECOND game to what might happen in game number 13. There's too much growing inbetween to do that shit.

Hey Nassty Nate, what i just said should sound familiar to you huh? Isn't this what all you tOSU guys said about last year? :D

bert89coupe
10-19-2006, 04:41 PM
and PT, why wouldn't i think UT might win if they get the chance to play tosu again(which i don't think will happen)? It's not like tOSU is just blowing people away on their schedule. And i'm saying this compared to the scoring done by UT and USC last year on the way to the Rose Bowl.

Nate
10-19-2006, 06:05 PM
Bert...have no problem with you or UT fans...just venom. I want UT to win (except against THE Ohio State University) :cool:

Pro Trash
10-19-2006, 07:08 PM
and PT, why wouldn't i think UT might win if they get the chance to play tosu again(which i don't think will happen)? It's not like tOSU is just blowing people away on their schedule. And i'm saying this compared to the scoring done by UT and USC last year on the way to the Rose Bowl.

I make this assessment based off the game from this year between Ohio State and UT. Unlike you this is not an assumption based off of the "if VY was still at UT and Bush/Leinart were at USC like last year". I am talking real world right now, no references made to last year okay.

Ohio State went into Austin and dispatched UT with no issue. I am not sure what you think of the score 24-7 but I think the fact that Ohio State scored points in every quarter and only allowed one score in that game made it evident that UT was out classed on Offense and Defense. I see that both teams are improving but I do not feel that UT would be able to overcome Ohio State in January if given another chance.

bert89coupe
10-19-2006, 09:38 PM
I make this assessment based off the game from this year between Ohio State and UT. Unlike you this is not an assumption based off of the "if VY was still at UT and Bush/Leinart were at USC like last year". I am talking real world right now, no references made to last year okay.

Ohio State went into Austin and dispatched UT with no issue. I am not sure what you think of the score 24-7 but I think the fact that Ohio State scored points in every quarter and only allowed one score in that game made it evident that UT was out classed on Offense and Defense. I see that both teams are improving but I do not feel that UT would be able to overcome Ohio State in January if given another chance.




then maybe you need to pull that big head of yours out of your ass then. Cause if you think this is the same team as when Ohio St. played them, then you're dumber than most people think on here.

on D, with T. Brown and Ma. Griffin in there the secondary would be a full strength and would allow different coverages for Ginn and Gonzalez. Not only that but Drew Kelson was also out and the LB's weren't playing very well at the time. Now would this change, maybe not but you have to add it in there if we're going to talk about it (i'm bored).

This was the game that let Colt age lightyears this season. If not for this game, even with the loss, he might not have had the confidence that he had for OU. But, because of the tOSU game, he will be a hell of a lot better QB at the end of the season, no matter who they play.


oh, and my assessment is for this year, you need to comprehend my sentence instead of just seeing the letters "UT" and "USC" and making that assumption. You should know this teacher pro trash.

bert89coupe
10-19-2006, 09:40 PM
Bert...have no problem with you or UT fans...just venom. I want UT to win (except against THE Ohio State University) :cool:



oh i know, i was just saying that because that's all i heard and read from Buckeye fans last year was "well, if we played UT now we would win" and all that. I just think it's funny that some UT fans are saying the same thing now. that's all.

Nate
10-19-2006, 11:51 PM
oh i know, i was just saying that because that's all i heard and read from Buckeye fans last year was "well, if we played UT now we would win" and all that. I just think it's funny that some UT fans are saying the same thing now. that's all.
Oh I wasn't saything...can't really bitch about anything if you didn't take care of your shit on the field in the first place.

unkoricky
10-19-2006, 11:51 PM
Auburn does belong where they are...

Hate as much as i hate Texas, they should be ranked better then WVU, RIGHT NOW..
[Yes SVTVYboyfriendOf Vince Youngs] you heard it here first...


But if WVU wins out their schedule, then its a whole diff. schedule/story

Pro Trash
10-20-2006, 09:35 AM
then maybe you need to pull that big head of yours out of your ass then. Cause if you think this is the same team as when Ohio St. played them, then you're dumber than most people think on here.

on D, with T. Brown and Ma. Griffin in there the secondary would be a full strength and would allow different coverages for Ginn and Gonzalez. Not only that but Drew Kelson was also out and the LB's weren't playing very well at the time. Now would this change, maybe not but you have to add it in there if we're going to talk about it (i'm bored).

This was the game that let Colt age lightyears this season. If not for this game, even with the loss, he might not have had the confidence that he had for OU. But, because of the tOSU game, he will be a hell of a lot better QB at the end of the season, no matter who they play.


oh, and my assessment is for this year, you need to comprehend my sentence instead of just seeing the letters "UT" and "USC" and making that assumption. You should know this teacher pro trash.

LOL you seem a little upset bert, I'm not the one quoting irrelevant stuff from last season, you were, so I suggest you stop posting idiotic crap so I won't have to point it out. As for UT being better than they were in the first game, I agree but then you also have to acknlowledge OSU is a much better team than the team that played UT earlier this year as well. I hope you aren't making the assumption that Ohio State is regressing while UT is gaining in leaps and bounds? It seems UT still hasn't truly come on par with OSU as of yet nor do I think they will. After the beginning of the Baylor game, I was a little worried about UT. They were essentially held scoreless by a team no where near their equal so they do have some issues, even though it was a convincing win, the start was not pretty. So one would need to rationalize such a start against a team such as OSU would be much harder to recover from.

davidaustin
10-20-2006, 11:27 AM
LOL you seem a little upset bert, I'm not the one quoting irrelevant stuff from last season, you were, so I suggest you stop posting idiotic crap so I won't have to point it out. As for UT being better than they were in the first game, I agree but then you also have to acknlowledge OSU is a much better team than the team that played UT earlier this year as well. I hope you aren't making the assumption that Ohio State is regressing while UT is gaining in leaps and bounds? It seems UT still hasn't truly come on par with OSU as of yet nor do I think they will. After the beginning of the Baylor game, I was a little worried about UT. They were essentially held scoreless by a team no where near their equal so they do have some issues, even though it was a convincing win, the start was not pretty. So one would need to rationalize such a start against a team such as OSU would be much harder to recover from.

Talk like this is really just pointless.

No team will be 'up' for every minute of every game.

*Here are some High Points of the BCS top tier from a few undefeateds. These are purely just examples... theres no agenda or trying to prove one is any better than the other.

WVU vs. East Carolina was 14-7 at halftime

Ohio State vs. Penn State was 10-6 with 2:30ish left

Ohio State vs. Cinci was 13-7 at halftime

Heres a good one...
USC hasn't won by more than 7 points in 3 weeks (against Washington St, Washington, Arizona St)

Louisville skirts passed Cinci with a 4th down stop on thier own 20

Very very few teams will go through a season without a hitch. Talking about who beat who and by what score doesn't really have any affect on the outcome. Keep winning and you stay in the hunt.

bert89coupe
10-20-2006, 11:34 AM
LOL you seem a little upset bert, I'm not the one quoting irrelevant stuff from last season, you were, so I suggest you stop posting idiotic crap so I won't have to point it out. As for UT being better than they were in the first game, I agree but then you also have to acknlowledge OSU is a much better team than the team that played UT earlier this year as well. I hope you aren't making the assumption that Ohio State is regressing while UT is gaining in leaps and bounds? It seems UT still hasn't truly come on par with OSU as of yet nor do I think they will. After the beginning of the Baylor game, I was a little worried about UT. They were essentially held scoreless by a team no where near their equal so they do have some issues, even though it was a convincing win, the start was not pretty. So one would need to rationalize such a start against a team such as OSU would be much harder to recover from.



i'm not, i was bored and in a typing mood last night. And i never stated nor do i believe that OSU hasn't gotten better as this year progresses. Also, i'm sure UT is the only team to have a close first quarter of play. I mean, OSU would NEVER have a tough first against a team like Cincinatti. So what does that mean? not jack shit


and it's awfully ironic that you of all people would call someone elses post "idiotic" good job.

Pro Trash
10-20-2006, 03:56 PM
Talk like this is really just pointless.

No team will be 'up' for every minute of every game.

*Here are some High Points of the BCS top tier from a few undefeateds. These are purely just examples... theres no agenda or trying to prove one is any better than the other.

WVU vs. East Carolina was 14-7 at halftime

Ohio State vs. Penn State was 10-6 with 2:30ish left

Ohio State vs. Cinci was 13-7 at halftime

Heres a good one...
USC hasn't won by more than 7 points in 3 weeks (against Washington St, Washington, Arizona St)

Louisville skirts passed Cinci with a 4th down stop on thier own 20

Very very few teams will go through a season without a hitch. Talking about who beat who and by what score doesn't really have any affect on the outcome. Keep winning and you stay in the hunt.


I disagree, if you do not wish to debate these points and their merits that is fine, I feel they are worthy of debate. Two problems with your post however, Number one is Baylor is not ranked nor has it been this season, Penn State was at the time of the OSU game. So it is kind of like apples and oranges when comparing these two games. Penn has 3 losses this season all to top 5 ranked teams at game time, OSU, MICH and ND. All three of those teams are currently ranked in the top 10 two of them in the top 2 or 3 spots depending on the poll you use.

Number two is the Penn State stats, at no point in the game was the score 10-6.

In the 4th quarter it went like this.

12:56 it was 14-3 OSU

7:33 it was 14-6 OSU

2:31 it was 21-6 OSU

davidaustin
10-20-2006, 04:24 PM
Two problems with your post however, Number one is Baylor is not ranked nor has it been this season, Penn State was at the time of the OSU game. So it is kind of like apples and oranges when comparing these two games. Penn has 3 losses this season all to top 5 ranked teams at game time, OSU, MICH and ND. All three of those teams are currently ranked in the top 10 two of them in the top 2 or 3 spots depending on the poll you use.

What does Baylor have to do with anything I have said??

I just threw up some close games by the remaining unbeatens... showing that no team will be 100% for every minute of every game. Seems like everyone throws out 'overrated' and starts raising eyebrows everytime a team doesn't put up history making numbers or put away should be beaten teams by the second quarter. Sometimes you just have hard fought 60 minute games.

Top teams find a way to win period. Whether ists ugly or not.

Number two is the Penn State stats, at no point in the game was the score 10-6.

Yes, you are right... I glanced at the box score and thought the 4th qt. TD was a FG. So tack on 4 more points (14-6)... really doesn't change the point.

bert89coupe
10-20-2006, 04:24 PM
I disagree, if you do not wish to debate these points and their merits that is fine, I feel they are worthy of debate. Two problems with your post however, Number one is Baylor is not ranked nor has it been this season, Penn State was at the time of the OSU game. So it is kind of like apples and oranges when comparing these two games. Penn has 3 losses this season all to top 5 ranked teams at game time, OSU, MICH and ND. All three of those teams are currently ranked in the top 10 two of them in the top 2 or 3 spots depending on the poll you use.

Number two is the Penn State stats, at no point in the game was the score 10-6.

In the 4th quarter it went like this.

12:56 it was 14-3 OSU

7:33 it was 14-6 OSU

2:31 it was 21-6 OSU



14-6, 10-6 i think you get the point being made. Then again, maybe you don't

Cartman
10-21-2006, 07:36 PM
I thought about why auburn is ranked higher, so what they lost to unranked arkansas, they still beat the number 2, number 6 or 9 can't remember what lsu was ranked when they played. texas beat what number 16 ou wow. they have better wins which is more important than better losses, at least to the computers.


I am still waiting for your answer to this. texas needs all the ranked teams they play to win out from here on. :D

SVTVenom
10-21-2006, 08:14 PM
I am still waiting for your answer to this. texas needs all the ranked teams they play to win out from here on. :D

To move up? No, they don't. All they need to do is win out and have the teams in front of them lose or win out and have the teams they play continue to stay in the top 25.

There are a shitload of scenarios right now so I'm not sweating it too much right now. I'm just enjoying another win over a ranked opponent. :)