PDA

View Full Version : "League Investigating Suspension for Stackhouse"


Who Needs 8
06-16-2006, 01:16 PM
Just heard that on the ticket.

bcoop
06-16-2006, 01:18 PM
Just heard that on the ticket.



You are an idiot. How many other thread has that been posted in?

To further prove you are a fucking moron, the league looks in to EVERY flagrant foul called. Genius I tell you.

ZYouL8R
06-16-2006, 01:25 PM
You are an idiot. How many other thread has that been posted in?

To further prove you are a fucking moron, the league looks in to EVERY flagrant foul called. Genius I tell you.

Hey lay off him, he doesn't watch anything even remotely associated with the NBA so his knowledge is lacking.

Zinc_Stang
06-16-2006, 01:26 PM
oh fuck!

bcoop
06-16-2006, 01:30 PM
Hey lay off him, he doesn't watch anything even remotely associated with the NBA so his knowledge is lacking.


lmao


I'm surprised he watches anything remotely associated with planet earth, because this douchebag is fucking OUT THERE.

Who Needs 8
06-16-2006, 01:49 PM
lmao


I'm surprised he watches anything remotely associated with planet earth, because this douchebag is fucking OUT THERE.


You probably think the earth is flat and revolves around you, fucking blowhard :rolleyes:

bcoop
06-16-2006, 01:56 PM
You probably think the earth is flat and revolves around you, fucking blowhard :rolleyes:



Sure I do, Corky. I can tell you what I do think. I think you are a whiny vagina with a 2" penis, yet you act like you have the balls the size of Shaq's head. Shut the fuck up, and crawl back in your hole. And don't come back out, until you actually know what the fuck you are talking about, faggie.

Hurley
06-16-2006, 01:57 PM
You guys fucking suck, seven posts and not one pertinent to the subject matter of the thread itself.

I don't think Stack should be suspended for a hard foul on a man twice his size.

ZYouL8R
06-16-2006, 01:59 PM
You guys fucking suck, seven posts and not one pertinent to the subject matter of the thread itself.

I don't think Stack should be suspended for a hard foul on a man twice his size.

Well considering the league investigates every flagrant foul, I don't see the point of this thread, but just to add something pertinent, he won't be suspended.

bcoop
06-16-2006, 02:00 PM
You guys fucking suck, seven posts and not one pertinent to the subject matter of the thread itself.

I don't think Stack should be suspended for a hard foul on a man twice his size.



I'm just pointing out how little he knows, about what he is talking about. Like I said. The league investigates EVERY flagrant, so I don't know why this is such a schocker. I don't think he deserves a suspension either. And it's going to cause a major uproar if he gets one.

Who Needs 8
06-16-2006, 02:24 PM
I'm just pointing out how little he knows, about what he is talking about. Like I said. The league investigates EVERY flagrant, so I don't know why this is such a schocker. I don't think he deserves a suspension either. And it's going to cause a major uproar if he gets one.


No, you're a fucking jackass blow hard that should be Banned. But I'll leave that to the evil one.

The Big Matt
06-16-2006, 02:28 PM
Brent should be banned? For what, calling out out on these rediculous sports threads that are nothing more than regurgitated crap from The Ticket, or Sportscenter, or where ever it is you get all your wonderful sports facts? I mean really, does it affect you one bit if, even if the Playoffs were rigged to any degree? Does it make you not able to sleep at night? Keep you from getting an errection??? NO!

Everyday it's some new fucking conspiracy theory with you Maston. You spend waaaaay to much time playing sports guru, when you should be trying to get laid. Seriously, let go of the "professional sports is overrun by cheaters, liars, it's rigged, everyone sucks, they get paid too much, blah blah blah" Fucking let it go man!

Who Needs 8
06-16-2006, 02:36 PM
Brent should be banned? For what,


Dude, you know his fucking "e-Bully" bull shit.

The Big Matt
06-16-2006, 02:39 PM
e-Bully??? never seen him e-Bully... Call em like he sees em... Sure. He stands behind what he says, and he's a very opinionated person. But an e-bully??? haha

Who Needs 8
06-16-2006, 02:41 PM
e-Bully??? never seen him e-Bully... Call em like he sees em... Sure. He stands behind what he says, and he's a very opinionated person. But an e-bully??? haha

Go search TSP, dude. He's a blowhard.

But I'm not going to waste my time arguing with you about a piece of shit like him, I need to finish up work.

The Big Matt
06-16-2006, 02:43 PM
I've known Brent for years. Blowhard? eh, nah. I'm 100 percent positive he backs up everything he says. And besides, what does TSP have to do with him disagreeing with you?

Who Needs 8
06-16-2006, 03:07 PM
I've known Brent for years. Blowhard? eh, nah. I'm 100 percent positive he backs up everything he says. And besides, what does TSP have to do with him disagreeing with you?


Well that's just dandy, but doesn't change a thing.

And like I said, go do a search.

TX21
06-16-2006, 04:31 PM
fuck the NBA they dont know how to call a game anyway.

Who Needs 8
06-16-2006, 04:37 PM
the verdict is out, he's suspended

ClockwrkOrangeS4
06-16-2006, 04:41 PM
Stackhouse is suspended and I'm dissapointed

Hurley
06-16-2006, 04:43 PM
Fuckin' rediculous!

I wish I could suspend David Stern for being a god damned retard!

46Tbird
06-16-2006, 04:44 PM
Just call me Nostadannus.
I can see a Game 5 suspension.

The Big Matt
06-16-2006, 04:56 PM
I trade you MBanga for Stackhouse??

Deal?

The Big Matt
06-16-2006, 04:57 PM
Just call me Nostadannus.

Balderdannus and we've got a deal!

46Tbird
06-16-2006, 04:58 PM
you got it, princess

The Big Matt
06-16-2006, 05:08 PM
but... I love it when you call me Big Poppa

hotrod66stang
06-17-2006, 04:27 PM
but just to add something pertinent, he won't be suspended.Are you sure? That's a bullshit ruling. Just earlier in that game Shaq threw his body into Dirk? as Dirk went around Shaq and went into the air for his shot. It was intentional and flagrant, and he's 2x the size of anyone on the Mavs. He didn't just turn and try to defend, he turned and jumped into the offensive player. I'm LMAO at all the people who still think "professional" sports aren't rigged to a certain extent.

ZYouL8R
06-17-2006, 05:05 PM
Are you sure? That's a bullshit ruling. Just earlier in that game Shaq threw his body into Dirk? as Dirk went around Shaq and went into the air for his shot. It was intentional and flagrant, and he's 2x the size of anyone on the Mavs. He didn't just turn and try to defend, he turned and jumped into the offensive player. I'm LMAO at all the people who still think "professional" sports aren't rigged to a certain extent.

Well fuck me for not being able to tell the future. I agree w/ Avery on this one, the NBA has been very incosistent on it's suspensions. Some fouls deserve it without a doubt, and others you say "WTF?" when the ruling comes out. The foul was ruled as a Flagrant 2, which leads to a suspension. The rules for a Flagrant 2 are pretty ambiguous:

If contact committed against a player, with or without the ball, is interpret-ed to be unnecessary and excessive, a flagrant foul--penalty (2) will be assessed

Any foul could be deemed a flagrant 2.

SVTVenom
06-17-2006, 05:09 PM
Well fuck me for not being able to tell the future. I agree w/ Avery on this one, the NBA has been very incosistent on it's suspensions. Some fouls deserve it without a doubt, and others you say "WTF?" when the ruling comes out. The foul was ruled as a Flagrant 2, which leads to a suspension. The rules for a Flagrant 2 are pretty ambiguous:

If contact committed against a player, with or without the ball, is interpret-ed to be unnecessary and excessive, a flagrant foul--penalty (2) will be assessed

Any foul could be deemed a flagrant 2.

The problem is, it wasn't called as a Flagrant 2 in the game. It was only a Flagrant 1. After the NBA got the game tape and reviewed it, they then ruled it to be a Flagrant 2 and gave him the 1-Game suspension.

ZYouL8R
06-17-2006, 05:13 PM
The problem is, it wasn't called as a Flagrant 2 in the game. It was only a Flagrant 1. After the NBA got the game tape and reviewed it, they then ruled it to be a Flagrant 2 and gave him the 1-Game suspension.

Well the on-court officials usually don't rule it a flagrant 1 or 2, that's up to the league office. It's rare to see an ejection from a flagrant.

Cartman
06-17-2006, 05:37 PM
it doesn't matter the mavs will bring the heat back to the real world and show them how it is done on sunday :cool:

bcoop
06-17-2006, 05:53 PM
Well that's just dandy, but doesn't change a thing.

And like I said, go do a search.



What good is a search going to do, you fucking bloody twat? As has been said, I call em like I see em. And I'll back anything I say. What's wrong, you little cock sucker? Does that scare your faggot ass?

bcoop
06-17-2006, 05:55 PM
Dude, you know his fucking "e-Bully" bull shit.



LMGDAO. Because I don't post threads crying, every time the wind changes directions; I'm an e bully? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahaha



Face it Maston, the world would be a better place if you had been aborted.

hotrod66stang
06-17-2006, 07:49 PM
If contact committed against a player, with or without the ball, is interpret-ed to be unnecessary and excessive, a flagrant foul--penalty (2) will be assessed

Any foul could be deemed a flagrant 2.
Man, I would have my agent/lawyer on that so fast. I'd try to argue the unnecessary AND excessive part. I'd try to get them on the ropes and disprove that it was both since the rule technically states it has to be both. Probably wouldn't do anything, but I'd try :o . I mean, he did go up against someone twice his size, how is that excessive?

Who Needs 8
06-17-2006, 08:12 PM
Man, I would have my agent/lawyer on that so fast. I'd try to argue the unnecessary AND excessive part. I'd try to get them on the ropes and disprove that it was both since the rule technically states it has to be both. Probably wouldn't do anything, but I'd try :o . I mean, he did go up against someone twice his size, how is that excessive?


Unfortuantly, Stern has this league so fucked up there are no Appeals.


Also, look for a fine from the front office on Avery. I love how everyone has been saying "Well, Avery doesn't disagree with the calls" . . Yeah, because he doesn't want the fines/suspensions. :rolleyes: Stern has an Iron Fist in everyone's mouth. It took all season for Avery to finally crack.

PUSHROD
06-18-2006, 12:28 AM
Sure I do, Corky. I can tell you what I do think. I think you are a whiny vagina with a 2" penis, yet you act like you have the balls the size of Shaq's head. Shut the fuck up, and crawl back in your hole. And don't come back out, until you actually know what the fuck you are talking about, faggie.


LOL, thats some funny shat....