PDA

View Full Version : Has anyone been following this case?


AL P
02-04-2005, 09:32 AM
Looks like someone went over there and fixed up Mr. Professor's pick up truck...LMGDAO

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,146354,00.html

Dismissal Process Begun for 9/11 Slur Prof
Friday, February 04, 2005

PHOTOS VIDEO

Click image to enlarge
STORIES
•Univ. of Colo. Faculty Backs 9/11 Slur Prof•Univ. of Colorado Professor Ward Churchill Speaks •Colorado Professor's Future on the Line•College Cancels Professor's Appearance•Prof Resigns as Department Chair Amid Furor Over 9/11 Remarks
AURORA, Colo. — University of Colorado administrators Thursday took the first steps toward a possible dismissal of a professor who likened World Trade Center (search) victims to a notorious Nazi.

Interim Chancellor Phil DiStefano ordered a 30-day review of Ward Churchill's (search) speeches and writings that will determine if the professor overstepped his boundaries of academic freedom and whether that should be grounds for dismissal.

Also Thursday, the Board of Regents issued an apology for Churchill's remarks at a meeting and voted to support the university's review of Churchill.

The raucous meeting drew dozens of protesters who back Churchill; at least two were arrested for disrupting the meeting and another was led away in handcuffs.

The regents refused to take public comment at their meeting, prompting an outcry from some of the 35 students who carried signs reading, "Protect academic freedom" and "Witch hunt." About a dozen professors also attended.

"I wish the regents had agreed to take some public comments," said law professor Barbara Bintliff, chairwoman of the Boulder Faculty Assembly (search). "Discussion and debate is what a university is all about."


Gov. Bill Owens issued a written statement saying he deplored the behavior of some of the students at the meeting, and that their behavior underscored the "culture of violence" that can be spawned by essays such as Churchill's.

Owens has called for Churchill's firing.

The furor erupted last month after Churchill was invited to speak at Hamilton College in upstate New York. Campus officials discovered an essay and follow-up book by Churchill in which he said the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks were a response to a history of American abuses abroad, particularly against indigenous peoples.

Among other things, he said those killed in the trade center were "little Eichmanns," a reference to Adolf Eichmann, who organized Nazi plans to exterminate Jews. The college canceled Churchill's appearance, citing death threats and concerns about security.

University officials have previously condemned Churchill's comments but defended his right to express them. University President Elizabeth Hoffman declined to comment Thursday on Churchill's future.

Churchill, whose pickup truck was vandalized with swastikas in front of his Boulder home sometime late Tuesday, has promised to sue the school if he is removed.

Earlier Thursday, the state Senate passed a resolution denouncing Churchill's comments as "evil and inflammatory." The nonbinding resolution was identical to one passed Wednesday by the House.

Democratic state Sen. Peter Groff cast the lone "no" vote, saying he disagreed with Churchill but that the resolution provides him with undeserved attention and attacks free speech.

Matt93Cobra
02-04-2005, 09:38 AM
That guy is a fucking cocksucker and deserves ALL of the backlash he is getting.

Danny
02-04-2005, 09:57 AM
He has a right to "free speech". That doesn't mean that he can't be fired by his employer for exercising that right in a way that brings negative publicity to the school.

It's legal to drink... but my employer has the right to fire me if I show up at work drunk. :confused: I don't see why there is any uproar at all.

The government is not censoring his book or harrassing him. He brought this all on himself. He made the bed, now it's time to sleep in it. It's called personal accountability, a trait the "liberals" don't seem to be comfortable with.

TexasDevilDog
02-05-2005, 01:48 PM
I think he should be fire. His comment is very hateful and divisive. The comment create such ferver that a discussion on his ideas is impossible.

They formed a technocratic corps at the very heart of America's global financial empire--the 'mighty engine of profit' to which the military dimension of U.S. policy has always been enslaved--and they did so both willingly and knowingly. If there was a better, more effective, or in fact any other way of visiting some penalty befitting their participation upon the little Eichmanns inhabiting the sterile sanctuary of the twin towers, I'd really be interested in hearing about it.

To see how inflammatory his remark is, all you need to do is change the word "Eichmanns" for any of the following words. If you feel that he should be fired for upsetting any other group then, he should be fired in this case too.

Words: Kikes, niggers, chinks, spicks, ect

AL P
03-18-2005, 09:50 AM
More about this fucking cockroach:

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=519&ncid=519&e=5&u=/ap/20050318/ap_on_re_us/embattled_professor


Funny how he threatens people who disagree with him out of one side of his mouth but BOO HOO's about it when people do the same to him. Such is the way of the leftie idiot these days.

I also like the part about him beating someone up. This mother fucker would cry like a little bitch at the thought of a physical confrontation.

mikeb
03-18-2005, 10:31 AM
Typical arrogant, socialistic, european-liberal type of person that hates the US and what it stands for. It's a shame that our universities are magnets for these kinds of people, and they poison our youth with their rhetoric.

exlude
03-18-2005, 04:02 PM
He has a right to "free speech". That doesn't mean that he can't be fired by his employer for exercising that right in a way that brings negative publicity to the school.

It's legal to drink... but my employer has the right to fire me if I show up at work drunk. :confused: I don't see why there is any uproar at all.

The government is not censoring his book or harrassing him. He brought this all on himself. He made the bed, now it's time to sleep in it.

Agreed, however, I thought vandalizing someone's property was something only the dirty libs did? Atleast, according to you guys.

Schargedcobra97
03-18-2005, 04:15 PM
Typical arrogant, socialistic, european-liberal type of person that hates the US and what it stands for.

but can only speek their mind here, and wouldn't LIVE anywhere else...

i remember a girl in my government class at brookharvard a few years ago.. long story short she hated america and said drum roll please

"Mexico is a much, much better country than U.S"....
lol i busted out laughing (should of slapped her) i asked her , "where have you been in mexico" she replies with
"cancun and (forgot the other famous vacation spot)"

AL P
03-18-2005, 04:54 PM
Agreed, however, I thought vandalizing someone's property was something only the dirty libs did? Atleast, according to you guys.

How do you know it wasn't some dirty libs? Oh you don't, that's right. I forgot.

exlude
03-18-2005, 05:12 PM
How do you know it wasn't some dirty libs? Oh you don't, that's right. I forgot.

So were you encouraging the dirty libs?

AL P
03-19-2005, 09:22 AM
So were you encouraging the dirty libs?

I sent them a check for a fucking $.25 to do it. It probably tripled their 2005 gross income when they cashed it.

Danny
03-21-2005, 09:13 AM
"YOU DAMN DIRTY LIB." lol

Anyways, are you insinuating that there was some kind of right-wing conspiracy to trash this guy's stuff? You could call me right-wing, and I wouldn't advocate doing a damned thing to this guy or his property.

Creeps come in lots of different demographics.

Sean88gt
03-22-2005, 06:03 PM
He also has the right to be fired for lying about who and what he is. This guy is a POS deluxe.