PDA

View Full Version : I got this off the internet how close is this...


TOMMY
12-07-2004, 10:08 AM
Formula for 1/4 mile ET -------> (1/8 mile ET + .22) Divide by .655

My best pass was a 7.05 = 11.09 in the 1/4

So if thats accurate it would take 6.98 to run a 10.99 in the 1/4

I'm just trying to figure out how deep in the 6's I have to go to be in the 10's in the 1/4


Tommy

musclestang89
12-07-2004, 10:11 AM
thats about right, I broke into the 10's with a 7.0 myself, even ran a 10.83 wih a 7.0. But I think I have about 5 more mph than you in the 1/8. Yours just cuts alot better of a 60ft than mine does.

Unseen
12-07-2004, 10:14 AM
Most folks I see multiply 1/8 time by 1.55 to 1.57 to get 1/4 time.

TOMMY
12-07-2004, 10:24 AM
Most folks I see multiply 1/8 time by 1.55 to 1.57 to get 1/4 time.

OK, 7.05 x 1.55 = 10.92
" x 1.56 = 10.99
" x 1.57 = 11.06 <----- I think I'm closer to this

Phoenix383
12-07-2004, 10:27 AM
Most folks I see multiply 1/8 time by 1.55 to 1.57 to get 1/4 time.

Yes thats about right it varies with cars weight and gearing but it is a good close estimate.

My firebird at 3760 went 6.85 1/8 and 10.69 1/4 so 1.55 = 10.6175, 1.56 = 10.686, 1.57 = 10.7545.

I think if the car is running good then 1.55 is best. the bird was on MT sportsman pros and spun a little on launch and it was in July track wa 112. so conditions were not optimal for a great run heavy car.

1.56 for a heavy var over 3200 is a good safe bet and 1.55 is safe for 3200 below for an estimate and conservative. imo

Unseen
12-07-2004, 10:32 AM
For example,

A turbo car will run faster in the back half, more mph, use 1.55 as the factor.

N/A car would use 1.57.

They are just estimates.

TOMMY
12-07-2004, 10:32 AM
Yes thats about right it varies with cars weight and gearing but it is a good close estimate.

My firebird at 3760 went 6.85 1/8 and 10.69 1/4 so 1.55 = 10.6175, 1.56 = 10.686, 1.57 = 10.7545.

I think if the car is running good then 1.55 is best. the bird was on MT sportsman pros and spun a little on launch and it was in July track wa 112. so conditions were not optimal for a great run heavy car.

1.56 for a heavy var over 3200 is a good safe bet and 1.55 is safe for 3200 below for an estimate and conservative. imo

Ok, if your right I'm in the 10's then. The car has to weigh 2800#'s or less
So that puts me at 10.92 in 1/4

TOMMY
12-07-2004, 10:35 AM
Well I just need to make a 1/4 mile pass. I just figured if i broke the 6's that would equal 10's in the 1/4. We will see sooner or later

SNEAKY
12-07-2004, 10:45 AM
get a cage :D

STROKD
12-07-2004, 10:53 AM
It depends on the car, My Stang when it was blown was * 1.53, and the Vette all stock but seriously aerodynamic is 1.53 also... ;)

Freeway cars... :o

White90GT
12-07-2004, 11:17 AM
1.57 has always worked for me n/a and on nitrous.
n/a timeslip:
1.67 sixty foot
7.50@92 1/8
11.763@115.48 1/4

7.50*1.57=11.775

nitrous timeslip:
1.59 sixty foot (spun a bunch)
6.895@101.19 1/8 mile
10.803@125.44 1/4 mile

6.895*1.57=10.825

The nitrous timeslip conversion is a little off due to lack of traction. It normally cut high 1.4x-1.51 on the sixty foot on the bottle.

TOMMY
12-07-2004, 12:16 PM
get a cage :D


I know :)

lee earley
12-07-2004, 12:18 PM
here is a chart also... http://home.att.net/~lsmctx/conversion.htm

purple piston eater
12-07-2004, 12:55 PM
I like to play with the drag performance calculator on the richmoundgear site
someone link it ....

TOMMY
12-07-2004, 02:10 PM
here is a chart also... http://home.att.net/~lsmctx/conversion.htm

thanks :cool:

sDun
12-08-2004, 09:59 PM
Cool, with the old little motor combo that was a 8.86 in the 1/4 using 1.55.

SSMAN
12-13-2004, 02:10 PM
This is in the ball park too....


http://www.allfordmustangs.com/Detailed/638.shtml