View Full Version : Guess Who's Supporting Kerry?
scrapwave
10-14-2004, 06:13 PM
Guess who is endorsing John Kerry?
When I received this, I thought that it couldn't be true so I
checked it out. After visiting this web site (Communist Party, USA.), it
appears that it is true. The entire
site is dedicated to the defeat of George Bush. If this was the only
piece of information I knew about the two candidates, it would cause
me to vote for Bush, for I will never be guilty of assisting the
communists in achieving their goals.
The Communist Party of The United States of America, CPUSA, is
publicly supporting the election of John Kerry.
No, this is not a typo...you read it correctly. The CPUSA has
made available on its Web site, http://www.cpusa.org/ (http://www.cpusa.org/) , an
advertisement entitled Top Ten Reasons To Defeat Bush. This
advertisement can be downloaded. The communist party urges readers
to place this ad in local newspapers throughout the country to defeat President Bush.
Remarkably, the "Top Ten Reasons" of the Communist party are
identical to those of the Democratic party; out-sourcing, homosexual
rights, abortion and the like.
At first, it was thought "this was only a coincidence." The
Democratic party of the United States couldn't be in lock step with
the Marxists! So, the originator of this email wrote to a spokesman
of the CPUSA in Georgia and here is part of the spokesman's letter:
"The CPUSA supports the John Kerry campaign with donations and
volunteer effort. We believe that defeating George Bush is the
single most important issue this November"
Doesn't that just give you a warm, fuzzy feeling inside??? :rolleyes:
O2BQIK
10-14-2004, 06:49 PM
No big shocker. Of the two main political parties in the US, certainly the Democratic party has more commonality with communism. I'm not saying Democrats are communists, I'm just saying they're closer to each other than communists are to Republicans.
Unseen
10-14-2004, 08:29 PM
I'm guessing those guys are somehow related to the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.
It is no suprise. He is also supported by the World Socialist Party.
It is not because he represents their beliefs, in fact, far from it. He is considered "right wing" to these people. They want to take away everything that this country stands for, property rights, basic freedoms, etc.. They also want to install a system where the lazy bums of our society are "entitled" to the same things as people who actually work for a living.
In a perfect world these morons would support the candidate who moves the system closer to their goals. If Kerry is elected, these people will support someone who is a more radical liberal than Kerry in the next election, hoping to finally get our society to where they think we should be.
Personally, IMO, these people are evil. They will lie cheat, steal, kill, DO ANYTHING to get their way. The media is full of their lies. No tactic is too low for these people who are the dregs of society. I have no respect for them whatsoever and think they should be deported to North Korea.
shrp88lx's
10-15-2004, 07:55 AM
Personally, IMO, these people are evil. They will lie cheat, steal, kill, DO ANYTHING to get their way. The media is full of their lies. No tactic is too low for these people who are the dregs of society. I have no respect for them whatsoever and think they should be deported to North Korea. HEHE to me that describes the Left wing democrat to a tee. :D
mopar63
10-15-2004, 07:59 AM
Personally, IMO, these people are evil. They will lie cheat, steal, kill, DO ANYTHING to get their way. The media is full of their lies. No tactic is too low for these people who are the dregs of society. I have no respect for them whatsoever and think they should be deported to North Korea.
You guys need to quit picking on Jessie Jackson.......... oops, you were not talking about him.
kangol
10-15-2004, 08:05 AM
There is a big difference between supporting a candidate, versus being against the other.
The pro Bush community will say “communists like Kerry, you’re not a communists, are you?” Pro Kerry groups would say “everyone is against Bush, including communists.”
It merely depends on how they want to spin it.
The Punisher
10-15-2004, 09:33 AM
Doesn't that just give you a warm, fuzzy feeling inside??? :rolleyes:
Kerry is a war criminal, he is their hero!
TexasDevilDog
10-15-2004, 10:18 AM
How can the CPUSA sell a ball cap for $20 on their site. They have a bunch and I don't have one. Shouldn't they just give me one? How dare they try to make a profit off of us people that don't have such a cool cap! :mad:
Stroked87
10-18-2004, 04:38 PM
When will people stop believing all the spam email and actually research things before speaking/posting. Once again a feeble attempt at mudslinging. The communist party is not in support of Kerry, they are plainly Anti-Bush. Hell they would vote for Al Sharpton if they thought he could beat Bush.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/kerry/cpusa.asp
The CPUSA's response to inquiries about their preference in the upcoming presidential election makes it clear that they don't really "endorse" Senator John Kerry or any other major <NOBR>candidate — their</NOBR> platform is far more anti-Bush than it is pro-Kerry or pro-Democrat, and they "support" Kerry in the sense of acknowledging that he is the candidate with the best chance of accomplishing their goal of defeating <NOBR>George W.</NOBR> Bush.
When will people stop believing all the spam email and actually research things before speaking/posting. Once again a feeble attempt at mudslinging. The communist party is not in support of Kerry, they are plainly Anti-Bush. Hell they would vote for Al Sharpton if they thought he could beat Bush.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/kerry/cpusa.asp
Didn't I just say that?
They'd vote for a box of turds if they thought it was a further left than Kerry.
TexasDevilDog
10-18-2004, 05:13 PM
When will people stop believing all the spam email and actually research things before speaking/posting. Once again a feeble attempt at mudslinging. The communist party is not in support of Kerry, they are plainly Anti-Bush. Hell they would vote for Al Sharpton if they thought he could beat Bush.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/kerry/cpusa.asp
If they state they are anti bush, but don't even have a blog for their candidate for president, then I say that is support for Kerry.
Mark57
10-19-2004, 01:34 AM
For the Sake of Peace and Future Security, Bush Should be Denied Four More Years
Citizen's Advocate Newspaper (Coppell, Texas)
[With full realization that we serve a Republican community in the President's home state, we feel a responsibility nevertheless to urge you to say no to a second term for George W. Bush, based on foreign policy and national security concerns alone. Judged by the international morass we are in today, four more years of continued Bush foreign policy could result in irreparable harm internationally and internally, affecting this nation's safety, security, and, most importantly, the lives of those whose burden it is and will be to carry out Bush's goals, our troops and the future military- our children.
One of the most disturbing aspects of Bush's foreign policy is our weakened and strained U.S. military, which reported this week that it is considering shorter combat tours to counter the expected decline in recruiting and troop retention. The Veterans Affairs Secretary addressed the considerable toll of guerilla warfare on the mental health of returning troops, requiring lifetime disability status and funding. This week, Secretary of State Colin Powell said the Iraqi insurgency is getting worse and there is an "increase in anti-Americanism in the Muslim world." Republican Senators John McCain, Chuck Hagel, and Richard Luger discussed the administration’s "grand illusion that we're winning" the war in Iraq. "We're not winning," said McCain, who has consistently called for more troops.
Those concerns relate to the war in Iraq, which even Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld this week admitted was not linked to the 9-11 terrorist tragedy, but we should be even more concerned about Bush's future foreign policy. It is not because of the war on terrorism that we are in a weak position militarily, but because of the war Bush outlined against nations in his "axis of evil" speech delivered immediately after 9-11- a war which he now calls "bringing democracy." Bush listed four nations in the axis of evil. Iraq was the first; the war has only begun. We can and must expect more war if Bush's foreign policy goals are reaffirmed at the polls. The Pentagon reports development of plans for possible action against Iran and Syria. Recent actions by Saudi Arabians and Pakistan could put them in line for the axis of evil. Our foreign relations are already strained to the breaking point with North Korea, China, Russia, most of Europe, Canada and Mexico.
Most disturbing of all, Bush recently said that "Cuba needs to be free of the tyrant (Castro)," the same thing he said before going after Hussein. Bush's antagonistic approach creates the need among nations to develop their defenses, including nuclear capability, the very thing we should be trying to prevent. Could the day come when other nations organize to oppose an aggressive U.S., particularly if Bush's position is reaffirmed by American voters?
Regarding Bush's homeland security plan, over 700,000 illegal aliens entered the U.S. this year along the Arizona border alone. How can our nation feel safe against terrorism, with so little safeguard against potential terrorists easily slipping over the border? Yet this year, Bush proposed a plan for expanding immigration.
No matter how slim the victory, if Bush is reelected, he will be emboldened to act with increased fervor in pursuit of his foreign policy goals, citing justification from his endorsement at the polls. We may worry about the Iraq war now, but those worries will undoubtedly escalate during a second term. The administration has already announced stepped-up attacks against insurgent-held Iraqi cities immediately following the election, forewarning us that violence will increase in Iraq and perhaps other parts of the globe after the election, if the Bush policy resumes. America cannot afford to "stay the course" when we are on the wrong track.
Even as he seeks Americans' votes, Bush has done little to ameliorate relationships with his own countrymen, as Great Britain's Tony Blair did recently, or with former allies, choosing instead to castigate those who disagree. How could we expect Bush's attitude to change if that attitude is reaffirmed with our votes? In the past, we were a nation respected for promoting peace and negotiating in a tough and strong manner, building strength among nations. Today, we may talk tough, but our foreign policy is crumbling while brave troops sacrifice their lives.
Four more years of Bush foreign policy will inevitably require many additional troops, including today's teenagers and pre-teens who may hesitate to volunteer after observing the results of George Bush's actions. Do not believe that a draft will not be reinstated just because someone tells you so before the election.
George Bush is a Texas product, and Texas needs to take responsibility on behalf of the country to help end his downward-spiraling foreign policy. Were there not a proven, strong, steady, courageous, highly intelligent choice, that would be a different matter. But we do have a choice, U.S. Senator John Kerry, who has been chosen four times by the people who knew him best. For the sake of world peace and our domestic security, please carefully consider making a change in leadership behind the closed door of the voting booth on November 2.
Who Needs 8
10-20-2004, 01:23 PM
The funniest thing is that I heard this morning that Russian President, and former head of the KGB, is against John Kerry but doesn't really say he's supporting Bush. He is against Kerry because he believes Bush is the best answer in the World's War on Terrorism.
Even Putin knows Bush can get the job done.
TexasDevilDog
10-20-2004, 01:35 PM
For the Sake of Peace and Future Security, Bush Should be Denied Four More Years
Citizen's Advocate Newspaper (Coppell, Texas)
Is it possible that you post something with your ideas, instead of completely plagiarizing the Kerry web site. http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/news/news_2004_1013.html
Funny thing is a search on yahoo news for "Citizen's Advocate Newspaper" returns no hits and on the internet search yields five results, all to Kerry's site or DNC site. What is the Citizen's Advocate Newspaper? http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=%22Citizen%27s+Advocate+Newspaper%22&ei=UTF-8&fr=FP-tab-web-t-165&fl=0&x=wrt
If they are real, they have nothing news worthy written for the rest of the news services to pick up on.
Fobra
10-20-2004, 04:09 PM
Is it possible that you post something with your ideas, instead of completely plagiarizing the Kerry web site. http://www.johnkerry.com/pressroom/news/news_2004_1013.html
Funny thing is a search on yahoo news for "Citizen's Advocate Newspaper" returns no hits and on the internet search yields five results, all to Kerry's site or DNC site. What is the Citizen's Advocate Newspaper? http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=%22Citizen%27s+Advocate+Newspaper%22&ei=UTF-8&fr=FP-tab-web-t-165&fl=0&x=wrt
If they are real, they have nothing news worthy written for the rest of the news services to pick up on.
lol...owned
Even Putin knows Bush can get the job done.
Putin likes Bush now that he changed his views about Russias own conflicts. Now Russias enemies are terrorists, before they were freedom fighters against evil Russia. It's funny how things change...
Putin likes Bush now that he changed his views about Russias own conflicts. Now Russias enemies are terrorists, before they were freedom fighters against evil Russia. It's funny how things change...
Yes, constantly killing civilians in order to further you cause does sort of change the way people view others.
Yes, constantly killing civilians in order to further you cause does sort of change the way people view others.
The views changed once USA was attacked, am I right? Before the blame was laid on Russia, being the aggressor it is. Putin has his motive right there to support Bush.
The views changed once USA was attacked, am I right? Before the blame was laid on Russia, being the aggressor it is. Putin has his motive right there to support Bush.
And? Should we have continued supporting the Chechans? I haven't seen a newstory where the Russians have intentionally killed several hundred school children or blew themselves up in Chechnya.
WhtEdge
10-20-2004, 05:17 PM
Kerry must be a COMMY!!!! Oh no! I hear more rednecks support Bush. If Bush an old school cofederate racists? Muist be. Bush looks like a monkey, Kerry looks like Frankenstein. Some the sh*t posted on here is ghey!
WhtEdge
10-21-2004, 09:59 AM
Well, your post certainly raised the level of quality, you high society elitist you... :cool:
HA! Thanks! ;)
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.